Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 26 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: christmas mini sessions #25097
    bananaslugs
    Participant

    There is nothing wrong with assembly line photography because, as CC says, the business is about making money.  We as photographers may balk that it’s not “pure photography” but if you can balance quality with the “take a number” formula, then why not?

     

    Yeah god forbid someone tries to *gasp* make some money to pay the bills. How plebeian of them. Look, I appreciate good photography and detest bad photography as much as anyone else here but photography is really a luxury at the end of the day. “Pure” photography (there’s a reason the starving artist stereotype exists) doesn’t always pay the bills and people have bills to pay.

    in reply to: Fauxtogs who should end up on the main page… #24825
    bananaslugs
    Participant

    That one might actually be funny and cute as a behind the scenes outtake or something. Or maybe it could be used for a drunk baby meme or other comedy purposes. Not as “professional” photo of course, but it is a pretty hilarious snapshot.

    in reply to: So, am I doing Ok for a beginner? #23523
    bananaslugs
    Participant

    “You should read your replies, you guys need to relax.”

    The same could be said of you. I went back and read your replies and you seem pretty uptight in many of your responses. Granted you did say sorry a few times but then you started to act uptight again (if I recall correctly).

     

    “Lol, I’m not nor ever will be a pro,”

    That’s no excuse for being so rude. You’re definitely not the only person who’s ever been rude on these boards but in this thread it was you who was mainly being rude.

     

     

     

    in reply to: Fauxtogs who should end up on the main page… #23451
    bananaslugs
    Participant

    “Not the best, but after a quick look I’d say they weren’t bad enough to be listed here.”

    @WSC True. On second glance they’re not good but also not anywhere near as awful as most of the fauxtogs listed here. It won’t allow me to delete my post unfortunately.

    in reply to: Fauxtogs who should end up on the main page… #23402
    bananaslugs
    Participant

    http://www.likensphoto.com/

    Flat lighting, pop up flash, selective coloring, and faces that are not in focus.

    in reply to: Fauxtogs who should end up on the main page… #23352
    bananaslugs
    Participant
    in reply to: Fauxtogs who should end up on the main page… #23335
    bananaslugs
    Participant

    @Crapulous

    You can tell her but she probably won’t listen. It’s the Dunning-Kruger effect. People who are the least skilled tend to overestimate their abilities whereas people with more knowledge are able to realize that there’s a lot they don’t know.

    Maybe post some links to REAL photographers on her page in the comments section lol. I’m naive enough to think that these fauxs will be humbled once they see some real photography. I almost became a faux when I first started out because I allowed the “OMG you’re so amazing!!” comments to get to my head a little. However, looking at some REAL photography immediately knocked some sense back into me and prompted me to delete my fauxtos from the internets.

    in reply to: This faux will most likely be sued… #23244
    bananaslugs
    Participant

    Any updates on the situation? Did the fauxtog get sued? Did the clients win?

    in reply to: Fauxtogs who should end up on the main page… #23217
    bananaslugs
    Participant

    Awww lighten up. Not every wedding photo has to be so serious. I actually think the idea was cute and funny, although I agree it was VERY POORLY executed from a technical standpoint. The focus, lighting, and composition are terrible.

    in reply to: Fauxtogs who should end up on the main page… #23096
    bananaslugs
    Participant

    My nine year old nephew has a better grasp of spelling and grammar. What a loser. I love how she writes, “Thanks for giving me a star for TRYING!”  Awww how cute. She’s trying to be “sassy” in response to the negative reviews. It doesn’t even look like she TRYING to improve her photography.

    in reply to: Fauxtogs who should end up on the main page… #23049
    bananaslugs
    Participant

    And this is probably petty of me but I get so annoyed when I see people who have never studied photography buying a full frame as their first camera. It just seems so spoiled and entitled to me. I don’t know maybe I’m just jealous because I’m not wealthy enough to buy expensive gear lol.

    in reply to: Fauxtogs who should end up on the main page… #23046
    bananaslugs
    Participant

    I can’t get over it. Do people like your friend ever look at the work of real photographers? I’ll admit, when I first got my Rebel xti, the praise from my friends did get to my head, even to the point where I started to think, “Hmmmm maybe I could make some money from this.” However, that idea prompted me to actually LEARN more about photography. Therefore I started going to local photography events, looking at photographer blogs etc. It took me about two seconds of looking at some photos at a local photog exhibit to for me to realize, “OHMYGOD my work is awful what the F**K was I thinking????!!!!!” I immediately felt extremely EMBARRASSED for thinking that I was actually good enough to go into business. How can these fauxtogs look at a photographer’s pictures and their own pictures without noticing the stark difference? I don’t get it. How does this happen when you have two fully functioning eyeballs?

    in reply to: Kind of new am i a fauxtog? #23025
    bananaslugs
    Participant

    Call me crazy (or maybe I need to calibrate MY monitor??) but I actually like the wonky colors although the colors in the stone building pictures are too wonky, even for me. Other than the stone shots and the random one with the selective coloring, I quite liked your shots.

    in reply to: [NOT MINE] Is this what passes for "wedding photography"? #22990
    bananaslugs
    Participant

    I agree. The pictures are mediocre by professional standards but definitely not bad enough to be on the front page here. There’s a fine line between photography that’s merely mediocre and outright FAUXtography in my opinion. I don’t think these pictures cross the line into fauxtography. I actually liked some of the photographer’s ideas although they were poorly executed.

    in reply to: I'm guessing this person is a fauxtographer #22985
    bananaslugs
    Participant

    It’s someone sharing a postsecret submission (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PostSecret), which is VERY popular among teens and twenty-somethings, on a tumblr blog. Anyway, my post was focused not on the website itself but on the mentality that all you need to do to be  a photographer is just push a button and not even bother to learn the basics. Even if that specific tumblr site is gone in a week, fauxtography is sadly here to stay.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 26 total)