[joe]

Looks like Imarealphotographer, should change his name to ImaOnePostWonder.  Just sayin…

[joe]

I find this unlikely lolz.  All his work has his watermark and is linked to all his social media outlets.  All the work of his i have seen is pretty darn good.  Better than anyone else i have check out on here.  Probably better than yours because i have yet seen a link to your images.  His work is defiantly better than the blank space you have provided.

[joe]

There is a huge difference between what kelsay posted and andy posted.  The second link you posted kelsey had some nice shots followed by some over processed bad shots.  The link Andy posted had bad shots followed up with worse shots and then horrible shots that literally made me puke in my mouth…

[joe]

What are you talking about those are fantastic!  blap blup, i just puked in my mouth a little…  Love the white brush tool backgrounds.

[joe]

jasonjared’s work is good.  Not perfect, but who is?  I havent seen yours yet jetpix.

[joe]

The original is so much better.  I disagree with the lighting being bad.  here are no harsh shadows.  There is a shadow under the brim of the hat but it is not harsh.  The Post Processing killed this image in my mind.

I think vignetting is a great tool when use properly.  I use it and you generally cant tell i used it unless you look at the original.  Used properly it helps draw the viewer in.

[joe]

I just want to see imarealphotogragher’s work.  Anyone making that claim right from the get go shouldn’t have an issue with supplying some examples.

[joe]

Everyone has a style.  I think these are beautifully aged.  Just my opinion.

[joe]

You have some fabulous images.  We all from time to time have crooked horizons.  I didnt see any depth of field violations here … oh the ever green in focus shoot…  that is a strange one.  But i love the way you aged some of these photos.  If you are interested in sharing do tell or PM me.

[joe]

I may have been a little crass and to the point but if someone is going to profess their skills they should back it up with some work.  I have had a really crappy day and dont mean to take it out on anyone.

[joe]

The second photo is much better.  Still not crazy about the yellow tint.  I would cut the tags off props though.

You said the first photo isnt cropped?  What camera are you using that gives you a square image?

[joe]

You really cant get an idea from one photo.  The lighting looks good, all nature light?  Its a little on the yellow side for my liking.  I usually only like grain in B&Ws.  This also has a very square crop.  I am not crazy about radical cropping.  This is all opinion though.  The blade of grass near the lips creates a bit of distraction and pulls the eye.  The subject is the main focus and nothing to distracting.  The composition within this strange crop is good.

[joe]

[quote=2425]As you see from my name, I’m a REAL photographer. lol Here to help give any insight needed to those that have lost their way into fauxtography land. Thx for this forum![/quote]

Lets see some proof buddy.  There is someone else who claims to be a skilled pro offering help and is clearly not.

[Author]

Posts