Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 86 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What stuff do YOU have? #14537
    Sharra
    Participant

    Jones, I’ve heard the Yongnuo flashes like the YN-560 II aren’t bad, but I’ve never used them so I can’t say for sure. Before the SB-910s, I had 2 SB-600s, then 2 SB-800s, and 4 SB-900s. I would’ve kept the 900s except for the over-heating issues, which I experienced on numerous occasions. Any more lighting will be strobes, but I’m torn between Alien Bees, Elinchrom, Paul C. Buff, Profoto, etc. I’m more into landscapers and kids sports like hockey, mountain biking, and lacrosse where strobes aren’t really viable. I see a lot of research on the horizon…

    in reply to: What stuff do YOU have? #14535
    Sharra
    Participant

    I forgot about the 28-300 3.5-5.6, which I got as a walk-around lens. It’s all been acquired over the last 6.5 years and really only the tripod, bodies, 70-200 and 2 SB-910s were purchased newโ€”the rest I’ve gotten on average of 70% to 80% of retail. It’s not Phase One or Mamiya, but it helps my addiction and now I think I’m in digital detox. ๐Ÿ™‚ I doubt I’ll be getting anything different for quite awhile unless I win the lottery; then I’ll go grab the 400 2.8, 600 4 and 800 5.6. Wishful thinking…

    in reply to: What stuff do YOU have? #14529
    Sharra
    Participant

    I started with the original Canon Rebel in 2004, then moved to Nikon with the D300 in 2007, which I no longer have. My arsenal now includes:

    2x D800
    16 2.8 D fisheye
    14-24 2.8
    24-70 2.8
    70-200 2.8 VR II
    24 1.4 G
    50 1.4 G
    85 1.4 G
    135 2 DC
    300 4 D
    17-35 2.8 D
    105 2.8 VR micro
    200 4 micro
    TC 14E II, 17E II, 20E III
    4 x SB-910 flash
    R1C1
    Gitzo GT2542

    I like the D800 for its 36 MP, but I wish it had more FPS for sports. The lens I’ve used the most has been the 70-200 for sports and for wildlife when I don’t have the 300 4. I’d love the 800 5.6, but I don’t have $17K.

    in reply to: The Flickr Conundrum #14477
    Sharra
    Participant

    Ebi, I have no desire to feed your ego. Admittedly, my reasons for asking are selfishโ€”I’d like to see them and ask about the how and why of any that pique my interest. After a day trip to a national park for some autumn landscapes, I came home disappointed even after reading about and trying to put into practice the techniques used by some well-known landscape photographers. I’ve come to the conclusion that I’ve got a long way to go and I thought you might be a source of visual inspiration even if you don’t shoot many landscapes. It’s really nothing more than that.

    in reply to: The Flickr Conundrum #14436
    Sharra
    Participant

    Ebi, you can’t fault a girl for asking, right? You’ve certainly offered more insightful advice lately as opposed to your brashness a few weeks ago and I respect that. When you’re ready, you’ll post, so I won’t ask anymore.

    in reply to: Just how sensitive to colour are YOU? #14366
    Sharra
    Participant

    KeyAndFill, if you wanted to share your results, I assume you got ). However the image link points to an image that is no longer available.

    EMF, I think the blue/green area is a problem for the good majority of people. It was for me, too.

    in reply to: The Flickr Conundrum #14365
    Sharra
    Participant

    Ebi, I’m not good enough yet to have to worry about being short changed for my images. But I’m sure a few of us here would like to see your Flickr stream! ๐Ÿ™‚

    in reply to: Fauxtogs who should end up on the main page… #14249
    Sharra
    Participant

    It’s clear Ricky has a command of the English language. No one is INSINUATING anything but his photography should be INCINERATED. His copyright infringements (past, present, or future) are blatantly obvious and his BADLY UNDEREXPOSED portfolios deserve to be showcased here. I have to wonder where he gets his “I’m God’s gift to photography” mentality.

    in reply to: You'll Never Be A Great Photographer #13709
    Sharra
    Participant

    Ebi, I concur with BEG. I was intrigued by the iPhone-lit Tomatilla Mary in your “A lazy shot” thread, but it has since disappeared. ๐Ÿ™ Are you sure a couple aspiring women photographers can’t convince you to change your mind about showing your work? I wouldn’t be surprised if there are others here who would like to see as well.

    If not, please keep up the friendly nature and constructive criticism.

    in reply to: Fauxtogs who should end up on the main page… #13612
    Sharra
    Participant

    Cookieboo, these attempts to “find” people are utterly pathetic. As was said, you should try improving yourself rather than wasting time trashing others that you have no idea who or where they are, me included. I can actually hear you saying, “I am wee Todd did. I am sofa king wee Todd did.”

    in reply to: A conversation with a friend #13559
    Sharra
    Participant

    The 41 MP Camera phone is the Nokia Lumia 1020. Fautographers are driven by more MP = better fauxtos.

    in reply to: Opinions/advice/critique/ect? #13121
    Sharra
    Participant

    Perhaps the horse in a hard right turn was asking the question Vy iz dehr zoh minny mohr orziz aziz dan dehr iz orziz? ๐Ÿ™‚

    in reply to: Reality Check? #13023
    Sharra
    Participant

    I’m more into the software side as a developer rather than hardware, but I have a couple friends who are doing quite well supporting both corporate and personal IT infrastructure. For me, I think it would be cool to be on the core development team for Photoshop or Lightroom or even the software behind hardware that every serious photographer uses, like calibrators.

    Six figures and world travel? I could definitely handle that! ๐Ÿ™‚

    in reply to: Bring your Rolaids #13022
    Sharra
    Participant

    I took a look at those displays and I’m impressed, to say the least. They’re out of my price range for now, but I’ll definitely keep the Apple Cinema Display in mind when it’s time to upgrade. Compared to the resolutions of those, I can see now why nesgran said I had low res!

    in reply to: Bring your Rolaids #13011
    Sharra
    Participant

    Nesgran, thanks for your input. I really didn’t give much thought to photography when I upgraded my system, but I realize now I probably should have. One of the first monitors I ever had for a desktop setup in the late 90s was a 19″ NEC CRT and, in retrospect, ย it was a far cry better than anything else I’ve used. Photography wasn’t the addictive passion then as it is now, but I’ll be sure to pay more attention to my displays when I can upgrade. For now, I’ll just have to make due.

    If you think 1920 x 1080 is low resolution, I can only imagine what you’re looking at as you do your own PP! ๐Ÿ™‚

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 86 total)