Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 116 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Horror of all horrors #2910
    Brownie
    Participant

    Or you could say, “Selective color in commercial photography is a fad that will soon pass leaving you with a tacky photograph of your beautiful daughter”

     

    That’s an interesting concept with just muting the color and not completely removing it.

    in reply to: Be gentle, it's my first time… #2909
    Brownie
    Participant

    “This is almost a good picture, but has exposure and color issues, hacked off limbs, and a wonky crop.http://www.flickr.com/photos/brokenfocus/7772962710/in/photostream/ But not making it over the hill to good, it rolled back down to bad.”

     

    I actually find the crop interesting but the exposure is horrific

    in reply to: I really hope I'm not… #2908
    Brownie
    Participant

    Stef made some great points and in portraiture, at least commercial portraiture, you need headroom on the frame. This one here lacks headroom: http://s1166.photobucket.com/albums/q613/AGloverPhotos/Hedeen%20Family%20Aug%2012th/?action=view&current=4736acbe.jpg

     

    But everything else has pretty much been said.

    in reply to: Am I? #2904
    Brownie
    Participant

    Jet,

    I mean as a way to stand out in wedding photography.  Sure. you can do every standard wedding photograph but nothing that’s going to be powerful and standing, his wedding pictures don’t hold my interest from an artistic and in some, technical standpoint. Is the family pleased? Probably. And that’s all that matters in commercial photography. I just don’t think anyone would go, “Oh, wow, WHO took THIS?”

     

     

    in reply to: Still Learning #2882
    Brownie
    Participant

    I’m glad you understand that you have a lot more to learn and a long way to go.

     

    What do you think about the content of the work that you have linked us to? Do you find it really engaging and interesting or bland?

    in reply to: So, Am I a fauxtog? #2880
    Brownie
    Participant

    Really? Oh wow, she’s stunning then. Hahaha, I thought you did some editing, nevermind then!

    in reply to: Am I? #2878
    Brownie
    Participant

    David hit is exactly right,

    ” I think you do best when you have more control over the photo, and are not good at capturing the unexpected, candid moments.”

     

    in reply to: So, Am I a fauxtog? #2876
    Brownie
    Participant

    Looks pretty good, just don’t overwhitened the eyes and the teeth.

    in reply to: Am I? #2862
    Brownie
    Participant

    Cool, I understand. The first step into understanding what you do is to question why you do certain things, why do you crop things, compose things a certain way, etc. etc. I was curious if you had really thought about it like that, and it’s definitely okay if you hadn’t.

     

    First thing I notice is that you’re work seems to be very contrasty. Another thing is one some of your recent portraits seem to be  “hot”, or blown out, in the highlights. I think this photograph (http://www.flickr.com/photos/passiveflight-photography/7168068903/in/photostream/) is the strongest portrait you have for me. It’s the most interesting for me.

     

    Maybe I’m just a cynical twenty year old, but the wedding photos don’t really do anything for me. They don’t seem to put a unique vision of the day, if that makes sense. I found that you have a lot of really nice monochrome landscapes buried in your collection. I like those a lot, technically they are really solid, for the most part. In fact this one here (http://www.flickr.com/photos/passiveflight-photography/6873161043/in/photostream/) reminds me of a BRILLIANT photographer by the name of Josef Koudelka who photographed with a panorama negative size. I think you’d enjoy his work

     

    If there’s anything else or anything you want me to address specifically, I’m glad to elaborate! 😀

    in reply to: Am I? #2849
    Brownie
    Participant

    I looked at your work and was curious as to what you enjoyed photographing the most.

     

    Tell me a little about your work and what you feel is strong with it and what you feel can be improved upon.

     

    in reply to: How to avoid being called a fauxtographer in 10 steps #2836
    Brownie
    Participant

    And criticism doesn’t have to be all negative, there might be one or two things in the photograph that work, like the lighting or the composition of a certain part or whatever. You have to keep yourself upon to criticism as an artist.

    in reply to: How to avoid being called a fauxtographer in 10 steps #2774
    Brownie
    Participant

    I agree, if I hadn’t had my work critiqued, I would be ridiculously bad YET I would think I was amazing. I think being open to criticism by people in the photography community is a very humbling experience and it can take people off of the “Cloud Nine” where they are the best ever. Good Addition, I Hate Fauxtography!

    in reply to: Photog or Fauxtog? #2772
    Brownie
    Participant

    Someone that excelled at still life photography (And made a ton of money with still-life) was Jan Groover. I’d suggest looking into her if you want to learn how to make captivating still-lifes. She had a mastery of formal elements of composition because she was a painter and she essentially painted with her camera.

    in reply to: Ch-ch-ch-ch-ch Check It Out #2770
    Brownie
    Participant

    The photograph of your cat on your tumblr page is actually really nicely composed.  It has a natural warmth to it, that doesn’t seem cliche or over done, it seems comfortable. Honestly, my favorite part of the photograph is the sunset outside, it adds to this warmth. Also the blue in that blanket compliments the oranges from outside as well as the orange in the cat.

     

    I like it!

    in reply to: I'm kind of scared but check me out? #2730
    Brownie
    Participant

    You have reason to be scared, unfortunately.

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 116 total)