Not long ago i was up on this website getting bashed SUCK IT!! =)

A quick look at your work, not bad at all, definitely not a faux. One suggestion I would make though, ditch the facebook gallery and set up a nice easy flowing website to really showcase your work. You don’t have to get rid of facebook all together, but I would use it to highlight your work and use it to direct traffic towards your web site where your best work can really shine.

Most would say that the watermark is distracting, and they would be right, but using facebook as your gallery, I understand why you need it.

I don’t recognize the name from that long ago, but I barely remember what I did this morning, lol.

I think it’s just Facebook being lame.  They changed something with the photos again.

Bolejack,

I’d hardly call being told that what you do is worth more than what you pay yourself, and some sharpening/editing was slightly heavy due to trying to compensate for Facebook, bashing. You received lots of complements, encouragement, advice and we all had your back when that faux (who obviously doesn’t know a thing about what makes a good photograph) tried to feed you to the lions for whatever reason.

I don’t feel any of us need to suck it. You aren’t telling us anything we didn’t already know, and tried to tell you.  Maybe try to re read what was said now that things are less fresh and heated?

I would say, given the context of your tone in this entire thread, that yes; it is just OK.

The image is oversharpened, giving it jagged edges when most brides prefer a slightly softer, feminine look. Not out of focus soft, but not jagged either.
There are no catchlights in her eyes, which draws my attention away and into the brightest part of the image, her right breast (left side of image). She is also looking too far right (again, left side of image). Though there is some white on the other side of her eyes, again, it does not draw me in and I am distracted by the blown highlights in her dress and arm.
The shadows on the left side of her face (right side of image) are very dark, which means the light wasn’t spread well and it’s a hard light.
The tree branches on the left side of the image should be cloned out. Having the random shadow where I expect seamless sky is distracting to the overall image.

The reason I am not jumping up and down congratulating you is because you came in here without conveying context to the newer forum lurkers/contributors. You were defended very heavily when you were, as IHF so aptly put it, thrown to the lions. Copping an attitude will not win you any favor here and by declaring “SUCK IT” with no background/context,  puts a lot of doubt in my mind that you will outgrow the naivete most new photographers suffer from early on in their businesses.

I agree with Ebi.

Oh wow! The attitude just keeps getting worse and worse. Kinda funny

I don’t think I’ll say another word, it would probably be misconstrued as “you’ll never go anywhere” and further “bashing”. (Eye roll)

5 Things You Should Know About Receiving Photography Critique

http://crystalclaritycopywriting.com/beginnersmind/

25 Photo Composition Tips

http://www.mcpactions.com/blog/2010/03/22/how-to-avoid-over-editing-your-photos-in-photoshop/

http://photography.tutsplus.com/articles/how-to-price-your-photography–photo-12207

I’ll just leave these links sitting here, it’s up to you if you research further or not, or get anything at all that pertains to your situation from them. I wish you the best.