Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: "Real" photographers are dumb #8853
    mmm
    Participant

    By the way… What you you mean with “A sculpture should not have wires sticking out or plaster falling off”? It seems you have very strong opinions about the formal aspects of all art forms… As in how they SHOULD look like…. Regardless the MEDIUM (media is plural)… Have you studied contemporary art? Or visited any galleries/exhibitions/museums lately?

     

    in reply to: "Real" photographers are dumb #8852
    mmm
    Participant

    Brown Eyed Girl, I wasn’t referring to you… I was referring to this site in general… Just read the descriptions of the posts. Many of them have a description which at least myself would find very insulting if it was me in the picture. Not sure where you getting at with the comparison of different forms of art… As when I read through this thread, I’m pretty sure that was not what OP was talking about… So far there hasn’t been any discussion of “Which is better art?”. Maybe you missed the point… But on the other hand a big part of photography aesthetic does derive directly from painting… One could say that photographing made photorealistic portrait painting obsolete. Also ever heard of camera obscura? And please don’t take this as an attack against you.

     

    in reply to: "Real" photographers are dumb #8833
    mmm
    Participant

    After following this site for a while the question that comes to my mind is not really why you mock fauxtogs but why do you badmouth also the people depicted in the pictures? I find that very rude and inconsiderate… For that purpose we already have Vice magazine…

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)