Home › Forums › Main YANAP Discussion Forum › Why didn't Jodi Arias take the card out of the camera?
- This topic has 13 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 7 months ago by GeekAndProud.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 23, 2013 at 1:47 am #10996KatieParticipant
Was it because she didn’t think they wouldn’t be able to recover the photos? or just because she is nutty? Any theories?
Old news, I know, but I don’t watch a lot of TV but I caught a special about her tonight.
(If you don’t know the story she took a bunch of photos, killed her boyfriend then threw the camera in the washer)
June 23, 2013 at 6:41 am #10997Worst Case ScenarioParticipantNo idea what you are talking about here, but I’ve left flash cards in my pocket and then washed my jeans. The cards were fine. All files readable and still using the card today.
June 23, 2013 at 9:40 am #10998cameraclickerParticipantI only know the little bit I read on Wikipedia. There are many questions. Why did the camera not go with the gun that has not been found? Why did she allow the pictures to be taken? How/Why did she make such a mess of her rental car if she did not move the body?
If it was not her camera she probably had no idea it had a card.
I have lots of cards. I still have all the cards I purchased over the years. They all still work. Cards are tough. Destruction of the card is the only way to ensure the data is gone.
June 23, 2013 at 9:53 am #10999GerblesParticipantSounds like she didn’t understand how digital cameras work.
June 23, 2013 at 10:27 am #11000GarrahmarieParticipantShe and others identify her as a Photographer. My assumption is that she didn’t know that it could be recovered after she deleted certain photos and ran the camera through a cycle!
June 23, 2013 at 10:33 am #11001nesgranParticipantSD cards are really hard to kill after all but she probably didn’t know that http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/7216467/Camera-dropped-in-the-ocean-is-returned-by-fisherman-18-months-later.html
June 23, 2013 at 1:57 pm #11002KatieParticipantIf I remember correctly…because I watched the lifetime movie, which was exaggerated followed by a real show about her…the pictures ended up being a big part of what convicted her (shows she was there and they had time stamps) although I think they would of gotten her either way.
Yes, as Garrahmarie said, she had wanted to be a photographer..so even though it wasn’t her camera, I’m sure she knew it had a card. I guess she thought deleting the pics and throwing it in water would be enough.
nesgran- That is amazing. You would think if anything would of killed it, it would be the salt-water
June 23, 2013 at 4:25 pm #11005Manual ModeParticipant@Garrahmarie I guess it kind of depends on what your definition of Photographer is. I have friends that have a daughter that went through cooking vocational school in High School and refer to her constantly as a Chef. Maybe it was a loose definition 8)
June 23, 2013 at 6:23 pm #11007KatieParticipant🙂 I think it was a loose definition. I don’t think Garrahmarie was saying she was professional photographer, just pointing out that she was an aspiring photographer, to reply to the earlier comments that Arias may not have known camera basics or that the camera had a card, even though it was her BF’s camera. If she was as “into” photography as the show implied, she definitely knew that much.
June 23, 2013 at 6:23 pm #11008KatieParticipantedit button is messed up. went to take the improper quotes out and it posted twice grr.
June 24, 2013 at 12:54 am #11022fstopper89ParticipantShe’s screwed up in the head, and par for the course with many psychopath murderers, she wanted to get caught. She couldn’t have been dumb enough to think it wasn’t possible to recover the images. It’s flash memory, come on. Everyone knows about putting electronics in a bag of rice when they get wet.
June 24, 2013 at 11:24 am #11028GarrahmarieParticipantYeah I was not calling her a Photographer, I was saying she and others identified her as such. 🙂
June 26, 2013 at 7:16 pm #11088ThomParticipantShe is the definition of fauxtographer. Her images SUCKED bad. My guess is that it was to draw suspicion to herself. Two things come to mind that she could do (keep in mind, I don’t know digital cameras all that well) 1) erase SD card (which I’m told sometimes you can recover files still) 2) take out SD card and throw into shredder than incinerate. I think she genuinely wanted to keep those “precious” memories. She’s really psychotic and glad she wasn’t released.
September 10, 2013 at 8:00 am #12876GeekAndProudParticipantSpooky how she has the same last name as the pro photographer Zack
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.