The rest of the photos might be good but this is schlock. Who does masking like this these days? Oh yea, single men from the middle east on dating websites. (seriously)
i bet the made it b/w cause the white balance was way off. in fact it doesnt even look like a b/w it looks like they desaturated it or took down the vibrance but not all of the way… you can see some color in the tiger’s nose and eyes
I’m going out on a limb here and say that the photographer who took a picture of this girl in front of the outhouse did NOT also take a picture of the tiger. So we also MIGHT be dealing with some copyright infringement here…..
Wondering if stripper/wannabe porn star paid for this session with a free lapdance. Assuming she’s the client, of course. The tiger’s eyes and nose colour are clearly more important than her.
And I only said ‘wannabe porn star’. I know pro photogs who have shot strippers for their (the strippers!) promotional material (the photogs in question never considered stripper work to be port-worthy, just something that paid the bills). They took a look and this and yeah, this was the kind of stuff clients were asking them to shoot.
The greatest photographs, from the greatest photographers, required technical skill, a sense of design, creativity, and respect for the moment. So much of what I see is the output of ignorant twinkie-tots who should be watching cartoons or monster trucks. Well, many of them are physically attractive – that’s very important these days,.
Did anyone else notice the car in the picture? It is in between the tiger’s head and the outhouse. It looks like maybe the girl was posing by a window and they masked everything else in? It just happened to catch my eye when I was looking at the pic.
A photography studio took this awful picture? PSed in this bullcrap? Wrote their name in such a lame font instead of getting a proper logo? I believe it! But at what point in PSing is it no longer photography? Is it really just about stealing photos off the web?
Zauberer
it has an 80s feeling
Janet S
Or wearing a bikini in the snow.
maegan
OBVIOUSLY she wasn’t really in the snow
Pozland
The rest of the photos might be good but this is schlock. Who does masking like this these days? Oh yea, single men from the middle east on dating websites. (seriously)
maegan
The rest of the photos ARE good, thanks.
Thom
This is the result of what happens when you attack Sigfreid or Roy. Tigers…be warned.
BurninBiomass
I think the image is missing a while Lamborghini. Maybe she should be holding a white sword.
Gina
Holy-whatness….
That one guy
i bet the made it b/w cause the white balance was way off. in fact it doesnt even look like a b/w it looks like they desaturated it or took down the vibrance but not all of the way… you can see some color in the tiger’s nose and eyes
Susan
That looks to me as thought it was intentional. Why? No clue.
Peace
She’s in front of the outhouse because door handles are hard.
I like all the partially transparent parts, including her branch-covered head.
Mark
I’m going out on a limb here and say that the photographer who took a picture of this girl in front of the outhouse did NOT also take a picture of the tiger. So we also MIGHT be dealing with some copyright infringement here…..
Grackle
The whole photo looks like it’s cobbled together from about four different sources.
Quetzal1
That was my first thought, too.
jeroen de haan
This image needs more cowbell…
Pelham
Wondering if stripper/wannabe porn star paid for this session with a free lapdance. Assuming she’s the client, of course. The tiger’s eyes and nose colour are clearly more important than her.
maegan
She is a “model” don’t know if you have heard that term, but fuck you.
Bill
Hay this should never be about attacking the model in the picture.. horrible photoshop indeed.. but calling the model a porn star.. be classy!
Alise
But she’s dressed like one. I’m sure she realizes this lol
Pelham
And I only said ‘wannabe porn star’. I know pro photogs who have shot strippers for their (the strippers!) promotional material (the photogs in question never considered stripper work to be port-worthy, just something that paid the bills). They took a look and this and yeah, this was the kind of stuff clients were asking them to shoot.
maegan
I agree 100%. BE CLASSY.
Digger
With all the photoshopping going on, couldn’t the fauxtographer do something about her stretch marks?
Marcos Dantas
You are talking about the tiger?
I think that are regular stripes.
meggy
Hey, stretch marks are nothing to hide or be ashamed of! 🙂 (especially if you are a tiger)
maegan
what stretch marks? Do you have a vision impairment?
Steve Sagala
The greatest photographs, from the greatest photographers, required technical skill, a sense of design, creativity, and respect for the moment. So much of what I see is the output of ignorant twinkie-tots who should be watching cartoons or monster trucks. Well, many of them are physically attractive – that’s very important these days,.
N.
OMG…watermark in Comic Sans too. Help.
dstone81
Did anyone else notice the car in the picture? It is in between the tiger’s head and the outhouse. It looks like maybe the girl was posing by a window and they masked everything else in? It just happened to catch my eye when I was looking at the pic.
Ann
A photography studio took this awful picture? PSed in this bullcrap? Wrote their name in such a lame font instead of getting a proper logo? I believe it! But at what point in PSing is it no longer photography? Is it really just about stealing photos off the web?
maegan
I think she looks better than all of you look on a good day.