The weird thing is, I think it might have been an okay shot without crappy editing. The lighting looks just fine. So how the heck do you know how to do that and NOT know that this is a terrible editing idea??
I think the only possible good in this is the lighting. The pose is horrible. She looks like she is having very bad cramps or needs to go to the bathroom. Even her facial expression is like, “Can I just have a Percocet, please?”
And the scribbly things? They clash with her jeans AND they are poorly placed. If they are supposed to be wings, then one of them should have been flipped and they should be inserted behind her shoulders, not on top of them.
I find a serious issue with the quality of the lighting, it’s rather flat and there was no technique used to create separation from the background.
The image also lacks decent contrast.
Yeah, it’s not excellent or anything, you’d just think that this person somewhat knows what they’re doing at least more than most of the fauxtogs that end up here.
I wonder, actually, if SHE is the fauxtographer… She might not have had a decent tripod and had to lean down to the camera lens. Just wondering because of the position of her right arm and her necklace…
Any halfway competent photographer could make amazing pictures with that model, since she at least is somewhat photogenic. This proves that an incompetent photographer can make an amazingly bad image with her.
The “wings” look like a signature, as both the red and the blue shape are the same.
The woman is beautiful enough to make a vey good photo, but her jeans are too “loud” as opposed to her shirt and the background. Posture is also all wrong…
The sad thing is that this could have been a decent picture…
Jackie
Could have been a decent picture without the ‘lovely’ photoshop work.
RottenFlower
Exactly what I was going to say.
NickE
Agreed.
Melissa
No. That pose and face make her look like she’s trying hard to take a dump.
ThreeEPhotography
I usually never comment, but WTH is this? I am dumbfounded!
Hannah Woodard
The weird thing is, I think it might have been an okay shot without crappy editing. The lighting looks just fine. So how the heck do you know how to do that and NOT know that this is a terrible editing idea??
Chuck
The lighting was probably pure accident.
A photographer
Yes, remember one of the rules of fauxtography: anyone can take a good picture but only a true artist can ruin it in Photoshop.
Wsroadrunner
More like What the F***?
Justin
The camera hanging on her necklace is even embarrassed about this.
Wsroadrunner
Looks like she’s about to wet herself..
ithurtswhenipee
Unflattering pose, poor crop.
meggy
What’s with the blue and red scribbles?
Hollie
Those are her rebel wings!
mo
so majestic!
Hollie
She looks like she is trying to hold in a fart..very unflattering…and the editing..well there are no words for that.
snapJim
A fauxtog finally got the lighting right and then they screwed it up with all that other crap. Sign. . .
editormum
I think the only possible good in this is the lighting. The pose is horrible. She looks like she is having very bad cramps or needs to go to the bathroom. Even her facial expression is like, “Can I just have a Percocet, please?”
And the scribbly things? They clash with her jeans AND they are poorly placed. If they are supposed to be wings, then one of them should have been flipped and they should be inserted behind her shoulders, not on top of them.
Timothy
I find a serious issue with the quality of the lighting, it’s rather flat and there was no technique used to create separation from the background.
The image also lacks decent contrast.
Hannah Woodard
Yeah, it’s not excellent or anything, you’d just think that this person somewhat knows what they’re doing at least more than most of the fauxtogs that end up here.
NickE
Awkward pose. It looks as if she is doing the pee dance.
David Gutierrez
I like her necklace
The Charlie Scott
As far as the lighting….even a blind hog will get an acorn from time to time.
The Charlie Scott
The lighting is just OK. A lady this pretty should be lit more specularly and with higher contrast.
John
I wonder, actually, if SHE is the fauxtographer… She might not have had a decent tripod and had to lean down to the camera lens. Just wondering because of the position of her right arm and her necklace…
Annoyed
I was thinking the same thing!
Mel C
those things on her arms…are supposed to be wings?
Ken
Any halfway competent photographer could make amazing pictures with that model, since she at least is somewhat photogenic. This proves that an incompetent photographer can make an amazingly bad image with her.
Philippos
The “wings” look like a signature, as both the red and the blue shape are the same.
The woman is beautiful enough to make a vey good photo, but her jeans are too “loud” as opposed to her shirt and the background. Posture is also all wrong…
The sad thing is that this could have been a decent picture…