Well see, my husband he was killed in a huntin axdent an I wanted pitchurs of our baby with his last huntin troffee. I thinks the fotagrafer did an exlent job at it.
When I saw this, I had to go back and look to realize there were antlers in here. I was stuck on the crappy overexposure and what appears to be some semblance of a high pass filter way the eff overdone…
oh my, I don’t even know where to start with what’s wrong with that.
I can usually find something nearly good in a photo (if I look really, really hard) but I have failed with this one.
WTH!? why is this poor child surrounded by sticks…. or deer antlers?! I mean its great that you are white trash, but is it necessary to display that in her infant portraits?! AWFUL, not to mention the “hdr-ish” look they have going on…. lovely!
Come on people – including the site owner – focus (pun intended) on the technical aspects of the photo, not on the setting or props. Maybe dad is a big game hunter or a taxidermist or maybe mom is – but whatever – that isn’t our (or the fauxtographer’s) problem.
Not everyone has your taste and style – deal with it.
The real problems with this image are: bad color, bad lighting and slightly snap shot like composition. Fix that and you’d have an acceptable baby photo.
Dave – I know where you’re going with that and all but the most important technical aspect of the photo begins with the composition and the idea itself. If that is flawed (or nonexistent in this case) how can you even begin to deal with the overexposure, poor editing and everything else?
We weren’t there – so we don’t know why the deer antlers and camo – maybe the parents are “rednecks” or just avid hunters… who cares? As long as their check cashes or money is not counterfeit – do the photo and make it look professional.
Heck for all we know – it could have been a submission to Field and Stream or one of the hundreds of other hunting magazines.
Is this (done right) something I’d put in my online portfolio? Probably not – but then again – it’s not me and I don’t know what the photographer is trying to market.
I’m not really seeing this, right?
Somebody slipped some Eugene Liquid sunshine into my pie.
It will go away when the clouds come out.
I’d better not eat any more, huh?
Michel Sauret
on December 15, 2011 at 1:00 am said:
Dude enough with these types of comments. Either trust that the site administrator is posting legitimate fauxtog work, or go away.
Reply ↓
simone
on December 15, 2011 at 1:23 am said:
amen
Reply ↓
JenM
on December 15, 2011 at 1:37 am said:
Agreed!
Reply ↓
CCP
on December 15, 2011 at 2:04 am said:
thankyou for saying it michael!
Reply ↓
Wsroadrunner
on December 15, 2011 at 3:08 am said:
I’ll second that.
Reply ↓
Anonymous
on December 15, 2011 at 3:17 am said:
And I’ll third that!
Reply ↓
Anonymous
on December 15, 2011 at 3:20 am said:
This poster was probably the Fauxtog that took this picture… or one equally as bad…
Angela
on December 15, 2011 at 3:39 am said:
I want proof God does or doesn’t exist. But I ain’t get that shit either.
Reply ↓
Gourmetguy
on December 15, 2011 at 9:42 am said:
“For the longest time I wouldn’t believe it, and then I saw the fields with my own eyes.”
Reply ↓
Sian on December 15, 2011 at 12:52 am said:
oh my, I don’t even know where to start with what’s wrong with that.
I can usually find something nearly good in a photo (if I look really, really hard) but I have failed with this one.
Reply ↓
leanne on December 15, 2011 at 12:53 am said:
The baby looks horrible! Never mind the crap around her!
Reply ↓
Jes on December 15, 2011 at 12:54 am said:
It hurts my eyes… I agree, Ted would def. not approve.
Reply ↓
Courtney on December 15, 2011 at 12:58 am said:
we can’t criticize for what the client wanted. we can, however, criticize the AWFUL lighting!!
Reply ↓
WHY OH WHY?! on December 15, 2011 at 1:09 am said:
Tip: Un-”edit” the image and take away the antlers and you have a snapshot of a beautiful baby….which is I’m sure what Mom & Dad would want.
Reply ↓
Megan on December 15, 2011 at 1:26 am said:
WTH!? why is this poor child surrounded by sticks…. or deer antlers?! I mean its great that you are white trash, but is it necessary to display that in her infant portraits?! AWFUL, not to mention the “hdr-ish” look they have going on…. lovely!
Reply ↓
Lindall on December 15, 2011 at 1:41 am said:
nah guys, it’s ok if you wear your sunnies while looking at it….
Reply ↓
Sandy on December 15, 2011 at 1:57 am said:
Wow….no words.
Reply ↓
Mark on December 15, 2011 at 2:03 am said:
I’m speechless.
Reply ↓
Dave on December 15, 2011 at 2:33 am said:
Come on people – including the site owner – focus (pun intended) on the technical aspects of the photo, not on the setting or props. Maybe dad is a big game hunter or a taxidermist or maybe mom is – but whatever – that isn’t our (or the fauxtographer’s) problem.
Not everyone has your taste and style – deal with it.
The real problems with this image are: bad color, bad lighting and slightly snap shot like composition. Fix that and you’d have an acceptable baby photo.
Reply ↓
Jeff
on December 15, 2011 at 3:16 am said:
Dave – I know where you’re going with that and all but the most important technical aspect of the photo begins with the composition and the idea itself. If that is flawed (or nonexistent in this case) how can you even begin to dealwith the overexposure, poor editing and everything else?
Reply ↓
Anonymous on December 15, 2011 at 2:48 am said:
Don’t you mean “oh deer”
Reply ↓
Me on December 15, 2011 at 2:56 am said:
Very sick!
Reply ↓
Wsroadrunner on December 15, 2011 at 3:10 am said:
My God, someone killed a baby!
Reply ↓
Wsroadrunner on December 15, 2011 at 3:11 am said:
Looking at this a second time I think that if this is what the parents wanted they were most definitely on the people ofwalmart site.
{Warning ~~ What follows is not very nice.}
As I see it, here’s the recipe for this composition:
1. Take a freshly dead preemie, stick a hat made of two pandas holding a breast-cancer-pink ribbon on its little head.
2. Purchase some used deer antlers and gnawed bones. Scatter them artistically around the scene.
Michel Sauret
on December 15, 2011 at 1:00 am said:
Dude enough with these types of comments. Either trust that the site administrator is posting legitimate fauxtog work, or go away.
Reply ↓
simone
on December 15, 2011 at 1:23 am said:
amen
Reply ↓
JenM
on December 15, 2011 at 1:37 am said:
Agreed!
Reply ↓
CCP
on December 15, 2011 at 2:04 am said:
thankyou for saying it michael!
Reply ↓
Wsroadrunner
on December 15, 2011 at 3:08 am said:
I’ll second that.
Reply ↓
Anonymous
on December 15, 2011 at 3:17 am said:
And I’ll third that!
Reply ↓
Anonymous
on December 15, 2011 at 3:20 am said:
This poster was probably the Fauxtog that took this picture… or one equally as bad…
Angela
on December 15, 2011 at 3:39 am said:
I want proof God does or doesn’t exist. But I ain’t get that shit either.
Reply ↓
Gourmetguy
on December 15, 2011 at 9:42 am said:
“For the longest time I wouldn’t believe it, and then I saw the fields with my own eyes.”
Reply ↓
Sian on December 15, 2011 at 12:52 am said:
oh my, I don’t even know where to start with what’s wrong with that.
I can usually find something nearly good in a photo (if I look really, really hard) but I have failed with this one.
Reply ↓
leanne on December 15, 2011 at 12:53 am said:
The baby looks horrible! Never mind the crap around her!
Reply ↓
Jes on December 15, 2011 at 12:54 am said:
It hurts my eyes… I agree, Ted would def. not approve.
Reply ↓
Courtney on December 15, 2011 at 12:58 am said:
we can’t criticize for what the client wanted. we can, however, criticize the AWFUL lighting!!
Reply ↓
WHY OH WHY?! on December 15, 2011 at 1:09 am said:
Tip: Un-”edit” the image and take away the antlers and you have a snapshot of a beautiful baby….which is I’m sure what Mom & Dad would want.
Reply ↓
Megan on December 15, 2011 at 1:26 am said:
WTH!? why is this poor child surrounded by sticks…. or deer antlers?! I mean its great that you are white trash, but is it necessary to display that in her infant portraits?! AWFUL, not to mention the “hdr-ish” look they have going on…. lovely!
Reply ↓
Lindall on December 15, 2011 at 1:41 am said:
nah guys, it’s ok if you wear your sunnies while looking at it….
Reply ↓
Sandy on December 15, 2011 at 1:57 am said:
Wow….no words.
Reply ↓
Mark on December 15, 2011 at 2:03 am said:
I’m speechless.
Reply ↓
Dave on December 15, 2011 at 2:33 am said:
Come on people – including the site owner – focus (pun intended) on the technical aspects of the photo, not on the setting or props. Maybe dad is a big game hunter or a taxidermist or maybe mom is – but whatever – that isn’t our (or the fauxtographer’s) problem.
Not everyone has your taste and style – deal with it.
The real problems with this image are: bad color, bad lighting and slightly snap shot like composition. Fix that and you’d have an acceptable baby photo.
Reply ↓
Jeff
on December 15, 2011 at 3:16 am said:
Dave – I know where you’re going with that and all but the most important technical aspect of the photo begins with the composition and the idea itself. If that is flawed (or nonexistent in this case) how can you even begin to dealwith the overexposure, poor editing and everything else?
Reply ↓
Anonymous on December 15, 2011 at 2:48 am said:
Don’t you mean “oh deer”
Reply ↓
Me on December 15, 2011 at 2:56 am said:
Very sick!
For starters, I have to agree with many of the other posters. Don’t pick on the kid or what the parents chose for the shot. Also, as an individual from Southern Alabama, I’d greatly appreciate it if individuals would maintain public decency and refrain from implying that all individuals from the South are inbred and lack proper education.
The fauxtographer is obviously an amateur who gets a little photoshop happy. The brightness is overwhelming and it seems that the individual went overboard with HDR. The only thing I will say about the props is that there is just too much going on. The props draw attention from the child as does the bow.
Had the “fauxtographer” taken their time and applied their full attention and creativity to the photo, it may not have turned out so horrendous.
I think this is the worst picture yet that has been posted on here. Truly horrific. I would normally want to post some witty sarcasm, but words fail me here.
I’m sorry, but with the box, the overexposure, and the antlers…I just can’t shake the feeling that the fauxtog made this poor kid look like a home-sick abortion.
This would be atrocious for an amateur, that’s what scares me. Not just bad but utterly disastrous. To think that someone paid money for this… I mean, OK, maybe the parents demanded the hideous bow and animal parts for some reason. And maybe the photographer fought them on it and lost. But he could still at least have taken a good picture (of a horrible scene). Maybe he thought a bad picture would make the parents never want to use him again? If so, he shouldn’t have let the picture get out into the wild. Please tell me this wasn’t on his website. This is…it’s a kind of bad I can’t even…express.
Reatha
UM!!!!! That’s disturbing!
Isa Beltran
oh no….why 🙁
Kelli
Oh…what do you say? No….just no.
Don
I’m pretty sure even Ted Nugent would disapprove of this photo.
Melissa Heuscher
HAHAHAHA! I know my pictures aren’t pro material… but damn… it’s that bad.
MM
W…..T……F…… !!!!!!
Daniela
Well see, my husband he was killed in a huntin axdent an I wanted pitchurs of our baby with his last huntin troffee. I thinks the fotagrafer did an exlent job at it.
RM
When I saw this, I had to go back and look to realize there were antlers in here. I was stuck on the crappy overexposure and what appears to be some semblance of a high pass filter way the eff overdone…
GBIC
I love you Daniela…
Daniela
<3
Anonymous
I reallllly hope you’re joking, w your statement AND horrific spelling!
Chris
moron
Mike
Must. Crank. All. Lightroom. Sliders.
ratti
where is the proof that this is a pro photo???? I see no watermark or business name blocked out anywhere
Michel Sauret
Dude enough with these types of comments. Either trust that the site administrator is posting legitimate fauxtog work, or go away.
simone
amen
JenM
Agreed!
CCP
thankyou for saying it michael!
Wsroadrunner
I’ll second that.
Anonymous
And I’ll third that!
Anonymous
This poster was probably the Fauxtog that took this picture… or one equally as bad…
Angela
I want proof God does or doesn’t exist. But I ain’t get that shit either.
Gourmetguy
“For the longest time I wouldn’t believe it, and then I saw the fields with my own eyes.”
kacey
regardless of whether it is a fauxtog or not, the picture is obviously on display for the public somewhere. No-one should be displaying this crap!
Sian
oh my, I don’t even know where to start with what’s wrong with that.
I can usually find something nearly good in a photo (if I look really, really hard) but I have failed with this one.
leanne
The baby looks horrible! Never mind the crap around her!
Jes
It hurts my eyes… I agree, Ted would def. not approve.
Courtney
we can’t criticize for what the client wanted. we can, however, criticize the AWFUL lighting!!
WHY OH WHY?!
Tip: Un-“edit” the image and take away the antlers and you have a snapshot of a beautiful baby….which is I’m sure what Mom & Dad would want.
Megan
WTH!? why is this poor child surrounded by sticks…. or deer antlers?! I mean its great that you are white trash, but is it necessary to display that in her infant portraits?! AWFUL, not to mention the “hdr-ish” look they have going on…. lovely!
Lindall
nah guys, it’s ok if you wear your sunnies while looking at it….
Sandy
Wow….no words.
Mark
I’m speechless.
Dave
Come on people – including the site owner – focus (pun intended) on the technical aspects of the photo, not on the setting or props. Maybe dad is a big game hunter or a taxidermist or maybe mom is – but whatever – that isn’t our (or the fauxtographer’s) problem.
Not everyone has your taste and style – deal with it.
The real problems with this image are: bad color, bad lighting and slightly snap shot like composition. Fix that and you’d have an acceptable baby photo.
Jeff
Dave – I know where you’re going with that and all but the most important technical aspect of the photo begins with the composition and the idea itself. If that is flawed (or nonexistent in this case) how can you even begin to deal with the overexposure, poor editing and everything else?
Dave
Jeff –
We weren’t there – so we don’t know why the deer antlers and camo – maybe the parents are “rednecks” or just avid hunters… who cares? As long as their check cashes or money is not counterfeit – do the photo and make it look professional.
Heck for all we know – it could have been a submission to Field and Stream or one of the hundreds of other hunting magazines.
Is this (done right) something I’d put in my online portfolio? Probably not – but then again – it’s not me and I don’t know what the photographer is trying to market.
Dave
Anonymous
Don’t you mean “oh deer”
Me
Very sick!
Wsroadrunner
My God, someone killed a baby!
Wsroadrunner
Looking at this a second time I think that if this is what the parents wanted they were most definitely on the people of walmart site.
stepford mwac
I’m not really seeing this, right?
Somebody slipped some Eugene Liquid sunshine into my pie.
It will go away when the clouds come out.
I’d better not eat any more, huh?
stepford mwac
Somebody killed a baby, surrounded it with trash and deer antlers, and stuck a goofy hat on it.
That’s sick!
that's not funny, that's sick
Michel Sauret
on December 15, 2011 at 1:00 am said:
Dude enough with these types of comments. Either trust that the site administrator is posting legitimate fauxtog work, or go away.
Reply ↓
simone
on December 15, 2011 at 1:23 am said:
amen
Reply ↓
JenM
on December 15, 2011 at 1:37 am said:
Agreed!
Reply ↓
CCP
on December 15, 2011 at 2:04 am said:
thankyou for saying it michael!
Reply ↓
Wsroadrunner
on December 15, 2011 at 3:08 am said:
I’ll second that.
Reply ↓
Anonymous
on December 15, 2011 at 3:17 am said:
And I’ll third that!
Reply ↓
Anonymous
on December 15, 2011 at 3:20 am said:
This poster was probably the Fauxtog that took this picture… or one equally as bad…
Angela
on December 15, 2011 at 3:39 am said:
I want proof God does or doesn’t exist. But I ain’t get that shit either.
Reply ↓
Gourmetguy
on December 15, 2011 at 9:42 am said:
“For the longest time I wouldn’t believe it, and then I saw the fields with my own eyes.”
Reply ↓
Sian on December 15, 2011 at 12:52 am said:
oh my, I don’t even know where to start with what’s wrong with that.
I can usually find something nearly good in a photo (if I look really, really hard) but I have failed with this one.
Reply ↓
leanne on December 15, 2011 at 12:53 am said:
The baby looks horrible! Never mind the crap around her!
Reply ↓
Jes on December 15, 2011 at 12:54 am said:
It hurts my eyes… I agree, Ted would def. not approve.
Reply ↓
Courtney on December 15, 2011 at 12:58 am said:
we can’t criticize for what the client wanted. we can, however, criticize the AWFUL lighting!!
Reply ↓
WHY OH WHY?! on December 15, 2011 at 1:09 am said:
Tip: Un-”edit” the image and take away the antlers and you have a snapshot of a beautiful baby….which is I’m sure what Mom & Dad would want.
Reply ↓
Megan on December 15, 2011 at 1:26 am said:
WTH!? why is this poor child surrounded by sticks…. or deer antlers?! I mean its great that you are white trash, but is it necessary to display that in her infant portraits?! AWFUL, not to mention the “hdr-ish” look they have going on…. lovely!
Reply ↓
Lindall on December 15, 2011 at 1:41 am said:
nah guys, it’s ok if you wear your sunnies while looking at it….
Reply ↓
Sandy on December 15, 2011 at 1:57 am said:
Wow….no words.
Reply ↓
Mark on December 15, 2011 at 2:03 am said:
I’m speechless.
Reply ↓
Dave on December 15, 2011 at 2:33 am said:
Come on people – including the site owner – focus (pun intended) on the technical aspects of the photo, not on the setting or props. Maybe dad is a big game hunter or a taxidermist or maybe mom is – but whatever – that isn’t our (or the fauxtographer’s) problem.
Not everyone has your taste and style – deal with it.
The real problems with this image are: bad color, bad lighting and slightly snap shot like composition. Fix that and you’d have an acceptable baby photo.
Reply ↓
Jeff
on December 15, 2011 at 3:16 am said:
Dave – I know where you’re going with that and all but the most important technical aspect of the photo begins with the composition and the idea itself. If that is flawed (or nonexistent in this case) how can you even begin to dealwith the overexposure, poor editing and everything else?
Reply ↓
Anonymous on December 15, 2011 at 2:48 am said:
Don’t you mean “oh deer”
Reply ↓
Me on December 15, 2011 at 2:56 am said:
Very sick!
Reply ↓
Wsroadrunner on December 15, 2011 at 3:10 am said:
My God, someone killed a baby!
Reply ↓
Wsroadrunner on December 15, 2011 at 3:11 am said:
Looking at this a second time I think that if this is what the parents wanted they were most definitely on the people ofwalmart site.
{Warning ~~ What follows is not very nice.}
As I see it, here’s the recipe for this composition:
1. Take a freshly dead preemie, stick a hat made of two pandas holding a breast-cancer-pink ribbon on its little head.
2. Purchase some used deer antlers and gnawed bones. Scatter them artistically around the scene.
that's not funny, that's sick
Michel Sauret
on December 15, 2011 at 1:00 am said:
Dude enough with these types of comments. Either trust that the site administrator is posting legitimate fauxtog work, or go away.
Reply ↓
simone
on December 15, 2011 at 1:23 am said:
amen
Reply ↓
JenM
on December 15, 2011 at 1:37 am said:
Agreed!
Reply ↓
CCP
on December 15, 2011 at 2:04 am said:
thankyou for saying it michael!
Reply ↓
Wsroadrunner
on December 15, 2011 at 3:08 am said:
I’ll second that.
Reply ↓
Anonymous
on December 15, 2011 at 3:17 am said:
And I’ll third that!
Reply ↓
Anonymous
on December 15, 2011 at 3:20 am said:
This poster was probably the Fauxtog that took this picture… or one equally as bad…
Angela
on December 15, 2011 at 3:39 am said:
I want proof God does or doesn’t exist. But I ain’t get that shit either.
Reply ↓
Gourmetguy
on December 15, 2011 at 9:42 am said:
“For the longest time I wouldn’t believe it, and then I saw the fields with my own eyes.”
Reply ↓
Sian on December 15, 2011 at 12:52 am said:
oh my, I don’t even know where to start with what’s wrong with that.
I can usually find something nearly good in a photo (if I look really, really hard) but I have failed with this one.
Reply ↓
leanne on December 15, 2011 at 12:53 am said:
The baby looks horrible! Never mind the crap around her!
Reply ↓
Jes on December 15, 2011 at 12:54 am said:
It hurts my eyes… I agree, Ted would def. not approve.
Reply ↓
Courtney on December 15, 2011 at 12:58 am said:
we can’t criticize for what the client wanted. we can, however, criticize the AWFUL lighting!!
Reply ↓
WHY OH WHY?! on December 15, 2011 at 1:09 am said:
Tip: Un-”edit” the image and take away the antlers and you have a snapshot of a beautiful baby….which is I’m sure what Mom & Dad would want.
Reply ↓
Megan on December 15, 2011 at 1:26 am said:
WTH!? why is this poor child surrounded by sticks…. or deer antlers?! I mean its great that you are white trash, but is it necessary to display that in her infant portraits?! AWFUL, not to mention the “hdr-ish” look they have going on…. lovely!
Reply ↓
Lindall on December 15, 2011 at 1:41 am said:
nah guys, it’s ok if you wear your sunnies while looking at it….
Reply ↓
Sandy on December 15, 2011 at 1:57 am said:
Wow….no words.
Reply ↓
Mark on December 15, 2011 at 2:03 am said:
I’m speechless.
Reply ↓
Dave on December 15, 2011 at 2:33 am said:
Come on people – including the site owner – focus (pun intended) on the technical aspects of the photo, not on the setting or props. Maybe dad is a big game hunter or a taxidermist or maybe mom is – but whatever – that isn’t our (or the fauxtographer’s) problem.
Not everyone has your taste and style – deal with it.
The real problems with this image are: bad color, bad lighting and slightly snap shot like composition. Fix that and you’d have an acceptable baby photo.
Reply ↓
Jeff
on December 15, 2011 at 3:16 am said:
Dave – I know where you’re going with that and all but the most important technical aspect of the photo begins with the composition and the idea itself. If that is flawed (or nonexistent in this case) how can you even begin to dealwith the overexposure, poor editing and everything else?
Reply ↓
Anonymous on December 15, 2011 at 2:48 am said:
Don’t you mean “oh deer”
Reply ↓
Me on December 15, 2011 at 2:56 am said:
Very sick!
wk.z
What a horrible picture of a dead baby!
e
HD-ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGH!
Brittany
Wow.
For starters, I have to agree with many of the other posters. Don’t pick on the kid or what the parents chose for the shot. Also, as an individual from Southern Alabama, I’d greatly appreciate it if individuals would maintain public decency and refrain from implying that all individuals from the South are inbred and lack proper education.
The fauxtographer is obviously an amateur who gets a little photoshop happy. The brightness is overwhelming and it seems that the individual went overboard with HDR. The only thing I will say about the props is that there is just too much going on. The props draw attention from the child as does the bow.
Had the “fauxtographer” taken their time and applied their full attention and creativity to the photo, it may not have turned out so horrendous.
JohnLF
I think this is the worst picture yet that has been posted on here. Truly horrific. I would normally want to post some witty sarcasm, but words fail me here.
Kevin W. Clark
I’m sorry, but with the box, the overexposure, and the antlers…I just can’t shake the feeling that the fauxtog made this poor kid look like a home-sick abortion.
Ann
This would be atrocious for an amateur, that’s what scares me. Not just bad but utterly disastrous. To think that someone paid money for this… I mean, OK, maybe the parents demanded the hideous bow and animal parts for some reason. And maybe the photographer fought them on it and lost. But he could still at least have taken a good picture (of a horrible scene). Maybe he thought a bad picture would make the parents never want to use him again? If so, he shouldn’t have let the picture get out into the wild. Please tell me this wasn’t on his website. This is…it’s a kind of bad I can’t even…express.
K. Proulx
overexposed … weird composition … stupid ribbons added in … baby looks like its ready for taxidermy … CREEPY !!!
Marco
Was that taken with a freakin 1st generation camera phone or something?