Forum Replies Created
September 4, 2012 at 5:17 am in reply to: Dealing with the illegal #3689
hahahaha, oh man I think I broke it.
catalogue of errors:
-Supposing I’ve invoked Max Weber right after I posted a Rothbard book.
-Supposing I am attempting to have some sort of meaningful discussion or debate about politics or philosophy with you or any of the other field mice here.
-Assuming I don’t post anywhere else.
-Assumption that I am much younger than you.
-Really strange notion that claiming to have company means claiming to have some sort of big business, rather than a simple legal entity created by filling out forms and paying a fee.
-Concept of value applied to collectives.
-Continuing and almost fascinating preoccupation with my evaluation of your worth. Did I hurt you that bad?
-You seem just about ripe to start with the “Texas, therefore you are stupid” line. Try it, this will surely work.September 4, 2012 at 4:32 am in reply to: Dealing with the illegal #3682
It sounds like your definition of intellectual masturbation is anything intellectual, or any sort abstract thought at all. That’s pretty much what I’d expect.September 4, 2012 at 4:29 am in reply to: Dealing with the illegal #3680
I have many companies and all of them pay taxes. What you’re asking here is that I explain politics to you in a post? If you had ever engaged in any sort of semi-meaningful discussion of philosophy, you’d know how absurd that is.
My advice is to read books–not the ones you read in school. Here’s a good place to start: http://mises.org/document/1011September 4, 2012 at 4:06 am in reply to: Dealing with the illegal #3676
A masters in political science yet no concept of the state as a violent, coercive entity. Classic.September 3, 2012 at 11:58 pm in reply to: Hey look a nature photog, lets throw rocks at him! #3670
The engagement album didn’t look too bad, although possibly only due to having subjects who know what to do in front of a camera. Also, colors are waaaay too warm.September 3, 2012 at 8:17 pm in reply to: Back up the trash talking? #3667
You want to evaluate or criticize a photo of some ears of corn?
Lots of people would be interested in this. Especially if you selectively color them.September 3, 2012 at 7:44 pm in reply to: Back up the trash talking? #3665
I do not shoot the kind of stuff seen on here so it’s more than somewhat pointless.
What could you possibly shoot that cannot be subject to evaluation or criticism?
Are you an MRI technician?September 3, 2012 at 7:34 pm in reply to: I want to know if I'm delusional :)) #3663
Looking at the stream I like the first couple of shots, although I’ve never been a fan of jaundice skin tones. After that it seems like a collection of boring snapshots. Moving in the right direction I guess.September 3, 2012 at 7:29 pm in reply to: I want to know if I'm delusional :)) #3662
That is stunning. it defines that figure beautifully in space.
You know, I think the most important part of creating anything artistic is first having taste.
It shows an understanding of technical aspects as well as composition.
looooolSeptember 3, 2012 at 7:27 pm in reply to: Dealing with the illegal #3661
That’s exactly what Stasi informants said. Don’t include me in your fascist rationalizations. There’s quite a difference between speech and physical violence. I would neither consider assaulting a competitor nor getting a thug in a funny costume to do it for me.September 1, 2012 at 7:02 am in reply to: Photo Shoot Etiquette #3612
I can’t type a simple sentence? Really? Are you sure about this?
What would not being able to correctly type a sentence have to do with being angry or immature or living in a video-game fantasy world anyway? Or were those just words you stuck together rather than a coherent progression of concepts?
Sooner or later you people are going to have to consider the possibility that you’re actually breathtakingly stupid and that I am merely an impartial observer.September 1, 2012 at 2:27 am in reply to: Photo Shoot Etiquette #3610
Pretending that a mistyped sentence is a grammatical error or that either is comparable to an error of logic is the hallmark of pseudo-intellectuals, and apparently alzheimery old fauxtogs alike.September 1, 2012 at 1:52 am in reply to: How many make their living from photography #3608
I only actually started asking for money a few months ago. I taking home a few hundred more a week as a result.September 1, 2012 at 1:46 am in reply to: Photo Shoot Etiquette #3607
It’s a comment, not an answer. Why did you bother commenting?
I swear this is the dumbest Internet community I’ve ever in which I’ve ever participated.August 30, 2012 at 10:53 pm in reply to: Why would anyone photograph a fat person? #3571
a person who has curves
It’s probably worth pointing out that the term “curves” in the context of the female body refers to the waist-hip ratio, not enormous mounds of excess adipose tissue. In all but few cases, being overweight actually reduces WHR, resulting in a far less curvacious figure.