Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 71 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Looking for a wedding photographer… #16098
    CoastalTog
    Participant

    Also wanted to add- your area is loaded with talent. Go to that website. You’ll see bunches of PA & NJ togs who do awesome work.

    in reply to: Looking for a wedding photographer… #16097
    CoastalTog
    Participant

    Julie- if you want the real deal you should budget $3,000-$5,000 for great photography.  Everyone’s on a budget but how much do you value the images that will last a lifetime. The flowers only last a day. The DJ/ band will be a distant memory. Your images will be with you forever.

    If you want to choose a great photographer, one that will capture your day professionally, go to fredmiranda.com. Click on forums and then the Wedding Photographer sub-forum.  That’s where the talent hangs. They post their latest work.

    in reply to: am i a fauxtog? maybe but to each their own. #15985
    CoastalTog
    Participant

    Do you pay your taxes on paid shoots?

    in reply to: Do I blow big chunks? #15984
    CoastalTog
    Participant

    I should add the reason it fails is because newb photographers like to think f/1.8 is the holy f-stop.  When you focus and recompose, the focal plane can shift and if you’re shooting with a wide aperture, you have very little forgiveness.

    in reply to: Do I blow big chunks? #15983
    CoastalTog
    Participant

    Focus and recompose 99 out of a 100 times ends with a big fail.  The D7100 has 3-D tracking mode.  Learn how to use that instead.

    in reply to: Some Concerns of Mine #15972
    CoastalTog
    Participant

    “The woman was overweight and wasn’t posed in any flattering ways.”

    This is one constant with all fauxtographers.  Rarely will you ever see a faux photographing stunning couples.

    in reply to: Fauxtogs who should end up on the main page… #15893
    CoastalTog
    Participant

    I noticed she’s using continuos lighting for portraits. One of the first clues of being a fauxtographer.

    in reply to: Photographer in Training #15756
    CoastalTog
    Participant

    I know it’s your life but are you sure you want to get a BFA?  Especially when your school doesn’t even teach studio lighting?  You’re pissing away money.  Get a degree in business- which will help establish your biz- and take photography classes and attend Meet-Up shoots.  A BFA/ MFA is one of the worst degrees to get according to Forbes, WSJ, US News, and every other news outlet.

    in reply to: Is there anything my friend can do? #15755
    CoastalTog
    Participant

    Unfortunately, it’s a gamble when you let newbies who just hung up a shingle to take pics of important events.  The best thing your friend can do is delay no further and pay for a professional and experienced newborn photographer to take her pictures.

    in reply to: Some Concerns of Mine #15754
    CoastalTog
    Participant

    eyedoc- I told you last week other forums were better: thephotoforum and photocamel (better of the two).  You didn’t believe me.  Told ya.

    in reply to: Whether we like it or not, fauxtogs ARE making money…. #15661
    CoastalTog
    Participant

    My issue is when “hobby” photographers charge for services and then don’t pay taxes.

    in reply to: Photographer in Training #15614
    CoastalTog
    Participant

    I think as you move into the lighting portion of class you’ll gain a better understanding.  In looking at the Lee family gallery on your flickr, almost every image could’ve benefitted from some fill flash.  When you shoot with the sun to the back or side, you’ll almost always need flash or a reflector at minimum if you want a well exposed background.  Speaking of backgrounds, some of your backgrounds do not lend to the image.  One of your shots was done at f/11 when you could’ve done f/5.6, making the background more blurry and less distracting.  Even with a family of 4 or 5, you can get away with f/5.6 if you know your depth of field.

    I took a peek at the exif data on a few images.  The D500 has a native ISO of 200.  Anytime you deviate from the native stops of ISO, you risk losing the dynamic range.  Also, try playing around with your metering modes.  Everyone was center weighted, which is a good starting point, but you have a few that could’ve benefitted from spot meter.

    Lastly, and this is something I stress a lot on here, is know how to sharpen and process for web viewing.  A few of your images are soft when flickr resizes them for viewing.  It isn’t until you view them in the original size that they are sharp.  The problem is your work should be viewer ready right from the start.  In the Lee album, the second image of the toddler alone should be pulled.  It’s soft regardless of what size you view it in.  Only show your best.

    in reply to: What do you think of my work, please …?? #15608
    CoastalTog
    Participant

    I wanted to add that I echo the above. I think you are creating some cherished memories. Understanding depth of field will take your images to the next level.  For instance, the image of the little girl and her dad would really pop by isolating the subjects from the background.

    in reply to: What do you think of my work, please …?? #15607
    CoastalTog
    Participant

    Doc- I should clarify. There is good advice given here. I give out solid gold advice for free! :). It’s just that most people on here are trying to go pro whereas you are a hobbyist (which is so refreshing, btw).  So…ya kinda threw me for a loop. Lol.

     

    in reply to: Opinions on Monolight Kit #15603
    CoastalTog
    Participant

    Wanted to add that aside from a pack and head system, I also have several Elinchrom BXri’s to take on location with a portable battery pack.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 71 total)