Home › Forums › Am I a Fauxtog? › Fauxtogs who should end up on the main page…
Tagged: fauxtog?
- This topic has 3,097 replies, 358 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 2 months ago by
cameraclicker.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 14, 2013 at 1:26 pm #11926
wtf
ParticipantAugust 14, 2013 at 4:12 pm #11928August 14, 2013 at 10:28 pm #11933alexandra
ParticipantAnd here I thought eyes were an important feature to look out for when shooting a portrait… not to mention good white balance and focus…
Oh, and ew! With the “blown away” one, I’m pretty sure I know another fauxtog who abuses the same set of photoshop actions with the bright, vibrant greens and blues, and a weird way of “fixing” certain areas of the image that are over, or under-exposed. To be honest, I don’t know much about actions, and I never used them, but when something looks this unnaturally horrid, you can definitely tell…
blown.away: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=272038249604657&set=pb.220302188111597.-2207520000.1376527323.&type=3&theater
supermommy: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=362754887181294&set=pb.201383103318474.-2207520000.1376527468.&type=3&theaterAnd here are some of my “favourite” shots from said photographer…
Desaturated skin baby:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=361660083957441&set=pb.201383103318474.-2207520000.1376531786.&type=3&theater
Cool sky that seems 100% legit:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=363932487063534&set=pb.201383103318474.-2207520000.1376531786.&type=3&theater
Skin tones so flat, there is no room for unwanted imperfections such as eyebrows, and hair:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=361193100670806&set=pb.201383103318474.-2207520000.1376531786.&type=3&theater
I’m sure the library loves to see their books being used like this:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=318991844890932&set=pb.201383103318474.-2207520000.1376533623.&type=3&theaterAugust 15, 2013 at 1:27 am #11936emf
ParticipantWhat is it with these names? Roulette Exposure and now Blown Away?! Is this some kind of sub conscious admission they can’t get the right exposure?
August 15, 2013 at 12:46 pm #11937youaintallthat
ParticipantThis literally took my breath away:
August 15, 2013 at 1:24 pm #11938fstopper89
Participantthat baby on the book may be single-handedly the worst child photo I have ever seen.
August 16, 2013 at 10:18 am #11963Worst Case Scenario
ParticipantWhen I saw this I immediately thought “they are looking at the REAL photographer” even though no real photographer would shoot a group against that wall
http://www.christina-dithmar-photography.co.uk/#tom-and-claire-blessing/39
but then later on I found these. Click here and then view the next shot in the series as well.
http://www.christina-dithmar-photography.co.uk/#tom-and-claire-blessing/7
I’m assuming that after doing all that work to badly remove the photographer see couldn’t be bothered to do it all again for the black and white version!!!
August 16, 2013 at 11:50 am #11970seth
ParticipantJust bwahahaha! That is awesome!!
August 16, 2013 at 1:30 pm #11975fstopper89
ParticipantWas she maybe the 2nd shooter? I literally only saw 3 ofmher photos, no time to look further, but she’s not totally horrible. She might have tagged along as a learning experience. That cloning is bad though.
August 16, 2013 at 5:31 pm #11980Silver
ParticipantAugust 16, 2013 at 6:03 pm #11985wtf
Participantphoto bomb?
wow is this shag carpet on the wall? Its sooo noisy…
August 16, 2013 at 6:30 pm #11988Boomer
ParticipantI have to share a couple from a local fauxtog…. The first I assume was an attempt at creating a glamorous portrait… The second is just toxic.
https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/64725_600111996695184_1688797533_n.jpg
https://sphotos-b-dfw.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/1069391_594152063957844_262314507_n.jpg
August 16, 2013 at 9:06 pm #11989wtf
ParticipantOh my those are pretty bad, Boomer. Wow!
August 16, 2013 at 11:58 pm #11996iliketag
ParticipantYIKES!
The ones Silver shared are pretty bad. I really loathe the diffuse glow-barbie skin. *shudder*
August 18, 2013 at 6:20 pm #12043fstopper89
ParticipantJessi-Lee has some pretty bad photos, mixed with some good photos, mixed with some good photos that were ruined by over-editing. She has a lot of over-softened skin. I think she has potential but I wouldn’t hire her. However, then I came across this one: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=143810282419677&set=pb.142618515872187.-2207520000.1376864247.&type=3&theater I honestly have no idea what she was trying to achieve here by ghosting a baby’s face onto a potato.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.