Home › Forums › Am I a Fauxtog? › Fauxtogs who should end up on the main page…
Tagged: fauxtog?
- This topic has 3,097 replies, 358 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 4 months ago by
cameraclicker.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 9, 2013 at 12:05 pm #11792
Katie
ParticipantAugust 10, 2013 at 10:26 am #11825urkiddingright
ParticipantWhenever I see “Great photo!” on something like this, all I can think is, “how is that gr…what?! I can’t even…”
How? How can anyone think that this looks good? Is it a joke? Are they serious?
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.599766540035627.1073741867.176461875699431&type=3
Save the children!!!
Edit: Almost forgot this gem
https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/64136_593876380624643_1873828321_n.jpgNow THAT belongs on the front page!
August 10, 2013 at 6:49 pm #11846seth
ParticipantYup those are all pretty bad.
Here’s something else. These people are trying to sell backdrops. The product photo on this does NOT make me want to buy that backdrop. http://www.backdropoutlet.com/DELUXE-MUSLIN/productinfo/MD2005/ There are many others that are just as bad or worse. I don’t get it.
August 10, 2013 at 10:18 pm #11850cameraclicker
ParticipantPlum Pizazz looks like it might be a really nice backdrop, though I would wait for the 10 X 20 to be on sale for $40. It would look a lot better if they straightened it out so there were no wrinkles. Why would they display it like that? I would have hung it so it had no wrinkles. That goes for the other ones too. I’m pretty sure they are intended to be flat.
August 12, 2013 at 11:27 am #11884alexandra
ParticipantI’m not sure how I feel about this one… This is no where near the worst this forum has seen – I mean sometimes she does have some nice shots – they’re all in focus and all, but I feel like most are over-edited and over-exposed.
This one is definitely over-exposed. If she was going for a washed-out look, at least do something to preserve to poor model’s back leg:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=532151643498840&set=pb.215330985180909.-2207520000.1376320013.&type=3&theaterNot sure how I feel about this kind of editing:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=498495266864478&set=pb.215330985180909.-2207520000.1376320255.&type=3&theaterDefinite use of on-board flash. Also, something seems a bit off with the un-naturally smooth skin and eye-whites:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=473407882706550&set=pb.215330985180909.-2207520000.1376320345.&type=3&theaterGaussian-burred background:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=391854797528526&set=pb.215330985180909.-2207520000.1376320482.&type=3&theaterflat skin-tones and instagram-like effect:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=491535980893740&set=pb.215330985180909.-2207520000.1376320255.&type=3&theaterAugust 12, 2013 at 12:46 pm #11885Lauryn
ParticipantI’ve got more fun for you all….https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=252219374896100&set=a.235838196534218.51481.235832373201467&type=1&theaterThis just seemed like another bad picture until I read the caption.https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=553048481409156&set=pb.215330985180909.-2207520000.1376325710.&type=3&src=https%3A%2F%2Ffbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net%2Fhphotos-ak-frc1%2F995156_553048481409156_2135873465_n.jpg&size=624%2C631Look, I found the 80’s!https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=519280628119275&set=pb.215330985180909.-2207520000.1376325717.&type=3&src=https%3A%2F%2Ffbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net%2Fhphotos-ak-ash3%2F967315_519280628119275_113096421_o.jpg&smallsrc=https%3A%2F%2Ffbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net%2Fhphotos-ak-ash3%2F182544_519280628119275_113096421_n.jpg&size=1365%2C2048Can anyone tell me why this is in her portfolio-sorta area? WHY?https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=507821202636021&set=pb.118453341572811.-2207520000.1376325969.&type=3&theaterThis reminds me of the snake eating its own tail…
August 12, 2013 at 1:40 pm #11887Participant“the most amazing photo I ever captured..” Oh my hahaha…
I don’t know if this page was shared here before, but these ones are rather terrible:
Sunburnt bride and groom with over-exposed dress and surrounding areas:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=671724652857499&set=pb.235765209786781.-2207520000.1376321392.&type=3&theater
Adding on, the weird patchy pixel chunks in some of their photos make me think of what happens when you try to de-noise, then re-sharpen a photo in lightroom. Also, this person seems to hold a lot of contests where you enter photos, which I really think is a bad idea for most (except in this case, where the photos entered are just as bad as the ones taken by this photographer).This one’s just weird, like the blur, and the angle, and the pose:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=670435439653087&set=pb.235765209786781.-2207520000.1376321400.&type=3&theaterI’d be surprised/gasping too if someone took a photo of me this bad:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=663691470327484&set=pb.235765209786781.-2207520000.1376321438.&type=3&theaterBlack bra under a strapless wedding dress – like, really? Maybe only someone with that bad of taste would hire this fauxtog:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=663691750327456&set=pb.235765209786781.-2207520000.1376321438.&type=3&theaterAugust 12, 2013 at 2:14 pm #11888emf
Participant“I said yes” ….so now he’s going to punch her in the face? WTAF, this must be the worst pose ever!
August 12, 2013 at 2:20 pm #11889ParticipantBlack bra under a strapless wedding dress – like, really? Maybe only someone with that bad of taste would hire this fauxtog:
It’ something in the drinking water. Click along a couple of photos, the bridesmaids are wearing black bras too.
August 12, 2013 at 4:21 pm #11890ParticipantWedding I recently did, the bride also had a black bra under her strapless gown but the difference was that her bra was also strapless. Poor thing though, so tiny, kept pulling her dress up. Thankfully the black rarely showed and in one where it showed a lot, I was able to Photoshop it out.
But yeah I guess sometimes you gotta wear what you have or what fits but you’d think they’d at least match color best they could. Guess in my case the bride didn’t dream that it would ever show, and then the day happened.
August 12, 2013 at 4:22 pm #11891ParticipantBut I seriously LOL-ed at that one of the sky. The verse and stuff was all real pretty on there but “best photo I have ever taken” just kills me.
August 12, 2013 at 4:25 pm #11892ParticipantLooking again, that wedding with the black bra looks like a shotgun wedding, for lack of better term.
I’ve done that before but mine was good. Had a BIG wedding party of all adults and had printed on sign grade stiff material that didn’t shine or crumple like paper. You know, cause I actually put thought into mine. Then I exposed it properly and didn’t cut off anyone’s feet.
August 13, 2013 at 12:00 am #11899iliketag
ParticipantI’m sorry, but if you’re getting married – buy a new bra. End of f*cking story.
August 13, 2013 at 2:17 pm #11910ParticipantAnd for today’s pile of s***, I give you this:
https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/1009806_480251252090506_430903472_n.jpgI realize weddings are stressful, but I think it is frowned upon to choke the wedding party:
https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/1002145_475554292560202_885838152_n.jpgFirst word: jail. Second word: bait. So incredibly classy
https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/544884_413085065473792_156891940_n.jpgRoses are red, violets are blue, her skin is purple and doll eyes freak me out
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/1102687_178674145648728_1066100429_o.jpgAugust 13, 2013 at 10:47 pm #11920ParticipantCameraclicker I missed your response earlier re: backdrop. Those things always have wrinkles in them, but yeah not like that, that’s big. I think they were going for a draped look but it doesn’t go this time and makes it look look like there’s trash or something on the floor.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.