Home › Forums › Am I a Fauxtog? › Fauxtogs who should end up on the main page…
Tagged: fauxtog?
- This topic has 3,097 replies, 358 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 4 months ago by
cameraclicker.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 25, 2013 at 6:08 pm #11527
BCLC
ParticipantWTF hahahaha that was entertainment for me first thing!! It just get worse not sure what this was meant to achieve but anyway…..
As for the baby picture wrong on so many levels!! Do people even think??
July 25, 2013 at 6:13 pm #11528ParticipantThis shot could’ve been great but was ruined by everything!! The Vignette the sepia the ugly 3 and ugly logo. such a cute baby an opportunity missed.
And this is just so wrong makes me so mad have some sense!!
I have to stop looking so many baby shots that could have gone horribly wrong!!
July 25, 2013 at 9:21 pm #11533NOLA-lass
ParticipantFound one! http://neworleans.craigslist.org/crs/3954166152.html
Yep his work speaks for itself 🙂
July 26, 2013 at 11:16 am #11534Worst Case Scenario
ParticipantOkay we are always joking that peoples bad photos hurt our eyes… but this website ACTUALLY DOES! I couldn’t work on pictures for a good ten minutes after looking at this. I think this guy must be seriously colour blind as everything he does is at 100% saturation. I found him on another forum (purpleport) asking if his camera was full frame? His profile says I am a full time photographer and have around a year experience. I work for pay only. i have a few websites and have started my own magazine (candee-girl-models-magazine) which is in its 5th issue.
His work on that site is even worse than his tumblr page but you need to be a member to see them.
Not really porn but might offend some people – look if you dare
Sunglasses advisable!!!!!
July 26, 2013 at 1:14 pm #11535July 26, 2013 at 3:30 pm #11537seth
ParticipantNot really porn but might offend some people – look if you dare
Nope, it’s porn. lol
Not all the photos may qualify as porn but he’s entering the industry for sure, has keywords for stuff at the bottom plus “members only” “censoring” etc. I mean, I just quickly looked so not sure what else but certainly at least looks like a “baiting” site to me.
And yes, complete fauxtog.
As for Sonya, I can’t view anything there.
July 26, 2013 at 6:29 pm #11538fstopper89
ParticipantLight, Camera, & Memories is just AWFUL. They can’t get any business on skill, so they throw in a bunch of crappy gimmicks, like $100 off this month, free photo coffee mug, etc. Here’s the price list. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=510166375716584&set=a.268909046508986.63917.157955294271029&type=1&theater
It’s interesting, someone gave her “two cents” about the bad placement of the watermark and the awful vignettes. She said “You have a decent camera, you can do better than that.” And someone else commented on a wedding photo with “You look pretty here, hopefully when you get them back you won’t have the company logo on the photos.” Obviously that person doesn’t understand the concept of a watermark, but their “watermark” which isn’t really even a watermark, just some shoddy, badly-placed hot pink font, and it’s super distracting. I can’t believe people pay for those photos. Those baby photos are worse than what I could do in my bedroom with a cell phone, no joke.
July 26, 2013 at 6:34 pm #11539ParticipantAt least do maternity photos when she’s further along, this just looks like she’s got a bad muffin top. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=499468770119678&set=a.499468760119679.1073741834.157955294271029&type=1&theater
Not to mention the poor technical quality.
July 26, 2013 at 7:32 pm #11565ParticipantI really want to ask “Is this a composite?” Because I already know the answer. With her lack of skills there’s no way it is. I can’t believe how dangerous this is. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=297964160270141&set=a.295732173826673.69077.157955294271029&type=1&theater
July 27, 2013 at 12:24 am #11569ParticipantProviding she knows what “composite” is!!
The baby already looks uncomfortable!!
This is where I want to make a fake profile just to ask those sorts of questions, because you know the abuse that would follow!! lol
July 27, 2013 at 1:27 am #11570cass335
ParticipantAwful vignette and…well…everything else. Why have a little girl “showing off” her leg?? IMO its an inappropriate pose…
July 27, 2013 at 11:50 am #11571cameraclicker
ParticipantI don’t think they are “showing off” her leg. They are keeping the dress out of the way so they can show a little foot in a big shoe. Unfortunately the light is terrible and the rest of the photo is at the same standard
July 27, 2013 at 8:55 pm #11572wtf
ParticipantJuly 27, 2013 at 9:03 pm #11573ParticipantIs it my monitor, or are all these colors waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyy off?? Like they used the cross process stuff from an editor program.
July 27, 2013 at 9:51 pm #11574ParticipantI think you are right WTF.
What annoys me is the doubles of the same image one colour and o
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.