July 1, 2013 at 8:55 am #11140
Spot colouring, kids in flower heads, awful backgrounds, it’s as if this one is trying to get featured here….
The boudoir shots are particularly bad, this is one of my favourites.July 1, 2013 at 9:03 am #11144
Why have I never thought of doing wedding shots like this…July 1, 2013 at 11:13 am #11146
Why have I never thought of doing wedding shots like this…
You aren’t a Japanese upskirt perv? You are right though, that faux was pretty badJuly 1, 2013 at 11:23 am #11147
Crime against humanity says it all.
Got a friend request from this great artist: http://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/2588053/viewall . On his site http://donsphotoworld.com/ you can also purchase all of these great pieces of art!
bloody hell, that was bad. I loved looking through the shots and then a couple of thoughts popped into my head. 1. Do models shit in the woods and 2. Does the man not own a sofa which he could use rather than photoshop the “model” in.July 3, 2013 at 1:26 am #11151ConcernedParticipant
Nesgran – $50 for one of those images ?? That is crazy!!!
Worstcase – I am so adding that to my wedding “have to” portraits!! UGH
I believe if I ever get married again – I want to be turned to wax!!
And I must not forget to pose my brides to look like aliens!!
I do believe the back of the grooms ring is the most important focus point for this photo!!July 3, 2013 at 5:14 am #11152
I think there’s a kid in this pic?
Won’t you be thrilled to receive this as a Christmas present….
Their photos might be awful but at least they have a catchy strap line….July 3, 2013 at 5:38 am #11153
nesgran – I went back to find the couch pictures, I just couldn’t believe they would need to green screen for a couch, those might be the funniest pictures I have ever seen, she isn’t making any dent in the couch, must be very light. What surprised me, it looks like they also green screened the couch into the background as well, most noticeable in the middle picture, you can see green on the armrest to the left of the frame.
Concerned – Take that back! that first picture is a wonderful photograph of wax figures! (the worse part is, it wasn’t a terrible picture to begin with, it was a nice moment she captured), and the ring picture, I don’t think anything is in focus
Worst Case – Maybe without the vignette we could tell if there was a kid…on second look, that’s not even a vignette, that is an Adjustment Brush with exposure all the way down..July 3, 2013 at 8:40 am #11154
I came across this one, now this is also a great photoshop job
Then lets go to the beach
before finally making it back to that photoshoped sofa (half naked girl)
I honestly don’t understand this guy, he has quite a few nice studio shots, the props might not be to my taste but they are well done and then he has all these truly awful shop jobs, nasty outdoor shots and a lot of what looks like random snapshots from around the house.
And let’s just finish off with a pixie for good measure
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=424255900988800&set=pb.100002131813824.-2207520000.1372855038.&type=3&src=https%3A%2F%2Ffbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net%2Fhphotos-ak-frc1%2F859214_424255900988800_1454308667_o.jpg&smallsrc=https%3A%2F%2Ffbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net%2Fhphotos-ak-ash3%2F539509_424255900988800_1454308667_n.jpg&size=1365%2C2048July 3, 2013 at 9:22 am #11156July 3, 2013 at 9:25 am #11157
Oh dear, I seemed to have uncovered some sort of photoshop fetish…….July 3, 2013 at 5:21 pm #11161
Worst Case – I think evette.smalls has a foot fetish, at least find some nicer feet.
wow, 2 separate foot fetish pages, Worst Case, need to confess something? (3rd link didn’t work) Those are some LOL LOOK WHAT I CAN DO IN PHOTOSHOP edits, wouldn’t dare post those online (nor would I make so many involving feet)July 3, 2013 at 6:36 pm #11162
Nothing to declare I was just following the “Like” trail from Shrink Guy
This should work but be warned some of the images are porn…
It seems to be some sort of fetish for being crushed by giant women.???????July 3, 2013 at 7:27 pm #11169
I think only-giantess is more a graphic designer, not a photographer, I highly doubt she took most of those pictures, but wow, that is some very weird stuff, wonder who her customer base is?July 7, 2013 at 4:27 pm #11178impulse101Participant
God these are bad… Top offender on mine is called Terry Scallion photography, she seems to have mastered sharpness and then abruptly stopped learning anything else ever.
For instance: I call this one “Even Babies Have Imperfections”- https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=460654023946443&set=a.273652949313219.75218.267089549969559&type=1&theater (Just because you CAN get everything super macro in focus, doesn’t mean you SHOULD…)
These two I think should be a set.. The “CloneStamp Madness” collection.
I just… Look at those backgrounds! The kissing one… What the hell was behind them the possessed her to clonestamp it out? On the one with the baby, it’s eyes are *almost* grotesquely over-sharpened enough to totally distract from the horribly clonestamped background- But not quite.
By the way, if any of you are interested, her package includes a CD with “an unlimited number of photos!” Which she refused to clarify when a guy asked her to give even an approximate number.
I am really more just mad at the people who tell these people they had any talent in the first place…July 7, 2013 at 4:41 pm #11179impulse101Participant
Also, “Fluffy Photography” is a troll. I have no proof of this, but I’ve convinced myself so I can go on living on this planet.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.