Home › Forums › Am I a Fauxtog? › Fauxtogs who should end up on the main page…
Tagged: fauxtog?
- This topic has 3,097 replies, 358 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 4 months ago by cameraclicker.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 1, 2013 at 8:55 am #11140Worst Case ScenarioParticipant
Spot colouring, kids in flower heads, awful backgrounds, it’s as if this one is trying to get featured here….
https://www.facebook.com/FluffyPhotography
The boudoir shots are particularly bad, this is one of my favourites.
July 1, 2013 at 9:03 am #11144Worst Case ScenarioParticipantWhy have I never thought of doing wedding shots like this…
July 1, 2013 at 11:13 am #11146nesgranParticipantWhy have I never thought of doing wedding shots like this…
You aren’t a Japanese upskirt perv? You are right though, that faux was pretty bad
July 1, 2013 at 11:23 am #11147nesgranParticipantCrime against humanity says it all.
Got a friend request from this great artist: http://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/2588053/viewall . On his site http://donsphotoworld.com/ you can also purchase all of these great pieces of art!
bloody hell, that was bad. I loved looking through the shots and then a couple of thoughts popped into my head. 1. Do models shit in the woods and 2. Does the man not own a sofa which he could use rather than photoshop the “model” in.
July 3, 2013 at 1:26 am #11151ConcernedParticipantNesgran – $50 for one of those images ?? That is crazy!!!
Worstcase – I am so adding that to my wedding “have to” portraits!! UGH
I believe if I ever get married again – I want to be turned to wax!!
And I must not forget to pose my brides to look like aliens!!
I do believe the back of the grooms ring is the most important focus point for this photo!!
July 3, 2013 at 5:14 am #11152Worst Case ScenarioParticipantI think there’s a kid in this pic?
Won’t you be thrilled to receive this as a Christmas present….
Their photos might be awful but at least they have a catchy strap line….
July 3, 2013 at 5:38 am #11153tylernothumbsParticipantnesgran – I went back to find the couch pictures, I just couldn’t believe they would need to green screen for a couch, those might be the funniest pictures I have ever seen, she isn’t making any dent in the couch, must be very light. What surprised me, it looks like they also green screened the couch into the background as well, most noticeable in the middle picture, you can see green on the armrest to the left of the frame.
Concerned – Take that back! that first picture is a wonderful photograph of wax figures! (the worse part is, it wasn’t a terrible picture to begin with, it was a nice moment she captured), and the ring picture, I don’t think anything is in focus
Worst Case – Maybe without the vignette we could tell if there was a kid…on second look, that’s not even a vignette, that is an Adjustment Brush with exposure all the way down..
July 3, 2013 at 8:40 am #11154nesgranParticipantI came across this one, now this is also a great photoshop job
Then lets go to the beach
And Japan
before finally making it back to that photoshoped sofa (half naked girl)
I honestly don’t understand this guy, he has quite a few nice studio shots, the props might not be to my taste but they are well done and then he has all these truly awful shop jobs, nasty outdoor shots and a lot of what looks like random snapshots from around the house.
And let’s just finish off with a pixie for good measure
July 3, 2013 at 9:22 am #11156Worst Case ScenarioParticipantDon’t quite know what to make of this guy.. But I’m pretty certain that’s not angelina jolie‘s hand
July 3, 2013 at 9:25 am #11157Worst Case ScenarioParticipantOh dear, I seemed to have uncovered some sort of photoshop fetish…….
https://www.facebook.com/evette.smalls
July 3, 2013 at 5:21 pm #11161tylernothumbsParticipantWorst Case – I think evette.smalls has a foot fetish, at least find some nicer feet.
wow, 2 separate foot fetish pages, Worst Case, need to confess something? (3rd link didn’t work) Those are some LOL LOOK WHAT I CAN DO IN PHOTOSHOP edits, wouldn’t dare post those online (nor would I make so many involving feet)
July 3, 2013 at 6:36 pm #11162Worst Case ScenarioParticipantNothing to declare I was just following the “Like” trail from Shrink Guy
This should work but be warned some of the images are porn…
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Only-Giantess/385454928239732?id=385454928239732&sk=photos_stream
It seems to be some sort of fetish for being crushed by giant women.???????
July 3, 2013 at 7:27 pm #11169tylernothumbsParticipantI think only-giantess is more a graphic designer, not a photographer, I highly doubt she took most of those pictures, but wow, that is some very weird stuff, wonder who her customer base is?
July 7, 2013 at 4:27 pm #11178impulse101ParticipantGod these are bad… Top offender on mine is called Terry Scallion photography, she seems to have mastered sharpness and then abruptly stopped learning anything else ever.
For instance: I call this one “Even Babies Have Imperfections”- https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=460654023946443&set=a.273652949313219.75218.267089549969559&type=1&theater (Just because you CAN get everything super macro in focus, doesn’t mean you SHOULD…)These two I think should be a set.. The “CloneStamp Madness” collection.
I just… Look at those backgrounds! The kissing one… What the hell was behind them the possessed her to clonestamp it out? On the one with the baby, it’s eyes are *almost* grotesquely over-sharpened enough to totally distract from the horribly clonestamped background- But not quite.
By the way, if any of you are interested, her package includes a CD with “an unlimited number of photos!” Which she refused to clarify when a guy asked her to give even an approximate number.
I am really more just mad at the people who tell these people they had any talent in the first place…
July 7, 2013 at 4:41 pm #11179impulse101ParticipantAlso, “Fluffy Photography” is a troll. I have no proof of this, but I’ve convinced myself so I can go on living on this planet.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.