Home › Forums › Am I a Fauxtog? › Fauxtogs who should end up on the main page…
Tagged: fauxtog?
- This topic has 3,097 replies, 358 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 4 months ago by
cameraclicker.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 20, 2013 at 3:29 pm #8015
dont.care
Participanthttp://www.bigboy-photography.com/services/off-site-services/ Lol taking photos of frito lay stand at walmart does not make a contractual agreement with frito-lay
LOL, dafuq
p647
March 20, 2013 at 3:32 pm #8016fabled
ParticipantI wasn’t aware Frito Lays hired fauxtographers.
March 20, 2013 at 3:35 pm #8018Participantlol
March 21, 2013 at 10:13 am #8066ANBvictop82
ParticipantI was looking for a photographer in my area and came across this fb page….
March 21, 2013 at 10:40 am #8070Participanthttps://www.facebook.com/#!/madewellart813
is like a C movie porno photographer.. Cheap, trashy, bad light, bad talent, and bad poses.. Bad photography too, guess all together it would cancel its self out 🙂March 21, 2013 at 7:04 pm #8120Camreamom1
ParticipantThere is tooo many around here!!!!! Here are some
https://www.facebook.com/StacyKlawonnPhotography#!/StacyKlawonnPhotography
March 22, 2013 at 12:29 am #8127mannequin
ParticipantMarch 22, 2013 at 12:52 am #8129youaintallthat
Participanthttps://www.facebook.com/StacyKlawonnPhotography#!/StacyKlawonnPhotography
https://www.facebook.com/#!/Heartbreakerphotography
Sure there are a few bad shots that these two have taken, but they’re pretty good for the most part. I’ve seen much worse!
March 22, 2013 at 1:34 am #8130ParticipantNow these….THESE are bad!!
Budget photographer? Do you even have to look any farther:
http://muncie.craigslist.org/crs/3611751530.html
Boudoir Event!
http://limaohio.craigslist.org/crs/3631028777.html
This:
http://indianapolis.craigslist.org/crs/3695566816.html
15 minutes? Really?
http://indianapolis.craigslist.org/crs/3686086191.html
This:
http://muncie.craigslist.org/evs/3629634783.html
Oh, my.
https://www.facebook.com/BostonJewelPhotography1
And the list goes on…
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Megan-Lila-Photography/162935497094008
March 22, 2013 at 9:20 am #8134fstopper89
Participantstacey Klawonn had a few good images but mostly not so good… I think hers could have been overall better but most were over-processed.
Heartbreaker had overall decent work that wasn’t quite there due to uch of it being underexposed. I think a little knowledge in fixing exposure in post-processing could have turned it around.
Those CL ads are horrific… one however was looking for people wanting free photos done and looked to be portfolio-building.
March 22, 2013 at 1:31 pm #8146ParticipantLol, several months ago I linked some of Bekka Gene’s awful photos here. I think I remember seeing a few comments and then someone ended up sharing her photos on that Facebook fauxtog bash page so she obviously got wind that her stuff was being ridiculed. I saw her page again today and she changed the title, and changed “professional services” to “just for fun” and wrote up a schpeil. Someone even commented that she needs a little help. https://www.facebook.com/BekkaGenePhotography
March 22, 2013 at 2:25 pm #8150owner77
ParticipantI have friends that use this photographer, but I can’t help but want to scream that the pictures or at least most of them are horrible. Is it Just me?
BLURRY and bright:
Noisy much:
Feeling Blue:
Desaturated Family:
Are they lying down?
Arm Goes Black:
March 22, 2013 at 3:06 pm #8152theflyingkitty
ParticipantIn reply to owner77.
In the first image, we can see up inside the little girls nose. That will be a lovely memory for later. “Look how clean my nostrils were at that age!”
In the second, the whole things is a bit too washed out, yellow, TOO off-center.
The fourth, the boy looks more desaturated than the door, giving him a ghostly feel. An upset ghost.
I then moved on to look at the rest, and at this point I decided that the photographer REALLY likes her filters/actions (and most likely, I think, one specific one in particular which uses FAR too much vignette) . It’s understandable. They can do cool things. I was there a few years ago. They do have a place and a use, but like much power, can also be misused easily. It is of my opinion that in this case, such things have been used to the point where they become more of the focus than the image’s true focus; in this case the people.
March 22, 2013 at 3:21 pm #8153ParticipantAnd hadn’t looked through this thread for a long time, so decided to give a good few of them a peak. The dude near Arnold MO probably lives within 30min from the lace I”m moving from. Never met him, and at least I am VERY sure he isn’t part of the meetup group. However, it’d probably be helpful if he was.
The other, and far more important thing, is that have you noticed that so many of the male “photographers” mainly have crappily shot pics of half naked women. And not even the sort of half naked women you’d have in the studio with proper lighting, costuming, make-up, digital touch-ups, etc but the sort that are just sitting around or standing, or etc.
March 22, 2013 at 6:14 pm #8157ParticipantNot sure what they were thinking…
Why??
No words for this one…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.