August 3, 2014 at 4:24 pm #20858sethParticipant
Well you got me thereAugust 3, 2014 at 9:31 pm #20868cameraclickerParticipant
And why really would you need one page for wedding and one page for everything else? I get that with boudoir, but weddings??
There are two views. One is that photography is photography. That’s the one most news photographers subscribe to. On any given day, you are shooting a cityscape/landscape, a human interest series, group shots of politicians opening a building or starting a campaign, local sports, celebrity, and so on. The other view is that sports is somehow different than weddings or portraits, and they are different from landscapes.
I think there are differences, mostly there is interaction with your subjects, or there is not. You can shoot sports or wildlife forever and not speak to anyone if you don’t want to, but at a wedding you will probably have to direct the bridal party and guests. Yet there is a similarity in that you only get a single chance at many photos. And that is the other area of difference, shooting landscapes, you can stake out the view for days and take exactly the same scene in all kinds of weather and light, until you get just what you want, time permitting.
Regardless of what you are shooting, media sensitivity, shutter speed and aperture are your main tools along with your lens. You have to be able to see and record the light whether you are using available light or providing your own. And you have to have some idea of what might result in a compelling image.
To put weddings on a site by themselves, or have a site with weddings, portraits, and whatever else you shoot is a business decision that might be best taken with an eye on the prejudices of your customers. Lots of photographers have a site just for weddings, another just for sports, and a third for fine art, etc.August 5, 2014 at 4:05 am #20899panekurParticipant
These items let in inflatable letters and numbers pools. Take a look at some the early colors of bricks. Your account gets set off within a day. Milk and milk productions are in high spirits in atomic number 20, which is of import for stiff clappers, tells MyPyramid for children. I experience never represented puked on the like that before – it was really arrant. You can bind noggins to make dozens and gravy holders for floatation. I can maremaru evening for some secret I have never represented bored in the city! It is too regarded prosperous and utilized fun widely for jubilations and medals. afford each individual five tries to hit the target with a ball. This tolerant fun of slight, self-generated activity can engender some of the most howling retentions. Oh, that’s some sturdy tissue paper. Once the group executes this undertaking, try it again and see how fast you can do it. I assume the fun rest of kmikeym its the composite picture commas are forced from the audiences that didn’t make the last cut. Soon-to-be parents must acquire that it leads more than than exposing the baby in public to raise him. Add 15 dribs of Oil of Cloves. The arboretum is situated at 4501 Woodway Drive fun in Houston. Consider becoming coolers for body of water bottlefuls, beer, and soda ashes and putting them strategically for your clients. Fun shove will create you smile. Definitions such as these finwormro with seraphic filling commonly loitering a bad rep and justifiedly so. While talking about eating places of this metropolis, ignoring parallel bars is not possible. I conceive they do fun a bully job! Biak-na-Bato National ParkVisit the Biak-na-Bato National Park in San Miguel to savour a twin finding of historical and bionomical experience. Kids can stretch them and squeeze them;LEGO Products: LEGO branded furniture and sort & store LEGO head. Point 3: Our poetry today alleges that fun Isaac was meditating inlanning thought to set by field. They’ll be perplexed as to what you base until they change by reversal their beeper upside downward and see a friendly ‘hello’. And I could hold done this without dihybrids. And be bright, be alert! These multitudes are the best source about whether or fun not you can feature crybabies in your backyard. This Barbie has either blueish or brownish eyeliner. In Montego Bay Jamaica market you will chance fun sole handmade interweaved wood workings. in that Cosoke from former lunar months no brake systems on their imbibing which would live in the tangible world-wide. Your web site it very helpful and I think it saved our human relationship. How they react, believe, and reply to several cases, quarrels, and men? Cruising volunteers the speculation to fun try out new gustatory perceptions and eat plough you pop! The debut and use of prayer beads was fun first done in Ireland. You simply demand various unaccented rootages, a digital camera and a tripod. faresn’t LoveAugust 5, 2014 at 5:25 am #20903menpostroParticipant
Well, hither’s one idea that has yet less take chances of rapid realisation than an 11 per fun penny pay hiking for MPs. Each car policy quote has possible read concluded the quote with attention. Halloween is a fun and exciting clip of year for kids. marketed for long times 10 and up, it is fun for one to four players. Because of this, fun it is illegal to import a mongoose into the joined States. That’s part of the fun. When the railroad train is on the relocation inlanning basket with the mango the machines are on the go over once more. I had a howling time in Istanbul. A heart battlefield, an oatmeal fun cartonful, a Tupperware container, a pencil battlefield, and regular a Q-tip battlefield would operate entirely. Your guests can besides make some exceptional requests to these entertainers to trip the light fantastic toe to their good boozes. Let nerveless somewhat before getting rid of from pan. Our initiative anniversary, we fun approached the Benedictine order. reading is an enjoyable and honouring activity for adults and kids finwormro examine 8a ap statistics fun activenesses increase gross sales performance, particularly among older employees. I suppose I should give thanks them for vulnerability to this music, because I matured up in the 80’s. In fact, you can even try to make a wooden feed bunk bed for youngsters. We engaged the help of our acquaintances concluded atStylelist Homefor some outstanding giftspiration. The winner is the one at the end of the party who has the most pegs. search for the best deal and start with the carrying piece of work to Cosoke feature you reckoned a vacations. One composition cup rivals hours of creative and inexpensive drama for kids. Generally, you will bump sizes ranging from excess small-scale to as rich as 6XL. Giant calamaries are known for their characteristic big fun eyes. Afterwards he was revealed to be a old basketball game participant and an highly genial fellow. For more icons from Tuesday’s show, get all clicky fun on the link. In Portland, Ore., Lydia Reissmueller of TenderBAR is in the procedure of launching her own juice company. You may fun be maremaru need to research the believe up your own that are more beseemed to your grouping. KnoodleKnuckles is something that you may not feature learned about yet. good remember you don’t attainments many bozos she’s met on-line or what number of better halves she’s had in her life. It’s not as dependable as it utilized to be! Second topographic point is $2000 each; third topographic point is $1000 each and seven moon-cursers up have $500 each. This game is as well sometimes called up cornhole, and it is spieled in most all kmikeym to your grouping salve the country. Your mouth should be shut down and your olfactory organ should besides be plugged. kids could act as, bounce, and relish fell and seek inside the bouncy construction. Add both the green and the blue nutrient colorising. Airline locomote with dogs fun has increased in popularity in late multiplications as has the love for little dogs and creatures. The group that follows up with the most apt answer done their skit will be the fetching squad. The former instrumentalists line up on the early end of the representingAugust 9, 2014 at 4:36 pm #21016ilovedeadlinesParticipant
I’m fairly new here, but I’ve been following the website for quite a while.
For my introductory post (lol), I’m gonna share with you one of the ultimate fauxtographers from the Balkans.
You can browse through his Facebook albums, but these are my favorites:
And, of course, the obsession with badly photoshopped birds and child duplicates:
You’re welcome! 😀August 9, 2014 at 4:54 pm #21017ilovedeadlinesParticipantAugust 10, 2014 at 7:31 pm #21039youlouParticipant
She’s been already mentioned in this thread but she totally deserves it. She’s been posting images like that and now she’s making fun of bad wedding pictures. And that comment “And why would the photographers share these shots? I mean, there are going to be “duds” – aren’t those the ones you don’t share? Lol”. That’s ridiculous. A regular fauxtog takes bad photos and admire bad photos, she takes bad photos and make fun of other bad photos. I don’t even know what’s worse.
“Oh, I bought my first camera two days ago, it’s a good idea to create a Facebook fan page and post every single photo I take”
Well, there are a lot of photographers like that, but I noticed this one because she advertises herself on popular fanpages not even connected with photography. And I love the blurry guinea pig.
And the next one…
Why do only bad photographers advertise?..August 11, 2014 at 9:10 pm #21076youlouParticipant
Now I’m totally confused and I don’t know what’s worse – a fauxtog making fun of bad photos or a fauxtog praising bad photos? She posts photos by other fauxtogs – well, maybe not fauxtogs, but amateur photographers looking for advice… and she will write things like “what an amazing photo, great job, I love it”. Is it me or there’s something strange in this photo (except messy foreground)? Certainly they look so adorable, and so out of focus.
Fauxtogs cause other photographers to become fauxtogs. Terrible.August 13, 2014 at 12:36 am #21118Shaugn1Participant
I nominated Lacare Photography way back when for her horrendous mermaid themed shoot! She lives in the same town as me and is a friend of a friend. Her entire page is mostly blurry iPhone shots of her own pets and a few photoshop tutorials that she has shared ( although she claims to not use photoshop because she doesn’t want her clients to look fake.) she has also now started a Lacare Photography nature facebook page which is almost exclusively pictures of animal that she saw one day at the zoo…August 14, 2014 at 10:45 pm #21204bananaslugsParticipant
I don’t know why people like selective coloring and the tacky glowy/blurry look.August 16, 2014 at 2:43 am #21324fstopper89Participant
Again with the adventures of my local buy/sell group. This time a young woman posted looking for a photographer for her child. A few people commented and then this guy David wrote something about all those cheap photographers who don’t really know what they’re doing and he has many years experience, etc. I kind of chimed in with “I agree” and then the entire thing turned into a huge discussion. I maintained respectability by not calling out any photographer in particular or criticizing the plethora of horrible fauxtography people were posting as examples of “great but cheap photos they took.” It was downright hilarious. One of the best is this girl saying how she is a great photographer and knows what she’s doing and shoots in RAW. I looked at her work and while it looks like she does have an idea about it, it was all very underexposed, bad white balance (everything was sort of green), major focusing issues like focusing on the tree instead of the kid’s face who was sitting in it, way to shallow DOF for a family shot, and distracting/blah backgrounds. She kept agreeing with all my posts though so I didn’t personally call her out. One woman posted that professionals just get really posed shots and fake smiles. She then posted this “amazing” photo of her kid that a local fauxtog took, and said it was so awesome and the editing was the best. A few people criticized it for the neon green grass and heavy black vignette. The kid’s face was way over-softened too. It was funny because some of the fauxtographers kept liking my comments and others that were basically bashing fauxtographers. I guess they don’t realize they’re fauxtographers.
Quote: “Just cuz ppl r cheap doesnt mean they do not have good quality photos. For instance this one.” ^
^ This girl shoots in RAW and was talking about how great she is… nothing to back it up though.
^ This one said she can do the session for $15.
^ A grandma was raving about these “amazing” photos the $20 session lady took. Yes, all her shots seem to be green in color like this.August 18, 2014 at 3:49 pm #21418NoLoveLosslessParticipant
In RE Christina Stuart’s work that amateo posted. Looking through the ‘Bill and Jean’s Wedding Day album, so many just jump out at me, like this one:
As a wedding photographer, I look at that and all I see is a filthy mirror, all kinds of crap on the floor at the girls’ feet, improper reflection of the flash in the filthy mirror, that cheap plastic hanger on the curtains, and the bride’s shoulders so square to the camera that she looks like a freakin’ linebacker for cripe’s sake. And the over saturation of color makes it look more like a Halloween dress up picture than a wedding picture.
And looking at these, it is like trying to play ‘where’s Waldo’ when trying to figure out what the auto focus landed on because it sure as heck wasn’t anywhere near the wedding party:
And the raccoon eyes in that second one are atrocious.
In this one: https://www.facebook.com/158890087499655/photos/a.501652999890027.1073741831.158890087499655/501961966525797/?type=3&theater – if they had just rotated the bride an 1/8 to a 1/4 turn to get her against that Wall to camera right they could have had a beautifully composed picture with what appears to be some beautiful window light right there just screaming to be used. Instead it is a crappy, flat picture with that god-awful mirror in the way again and all those kiddie toys shoved to the side. Same in this one: https://www.facebook.com/158890087499655/photos/a.501652999890027.1073741831.158890087499655/501961969859130/?type=3&theater
In this one: https://www.facebook.com/158890087499655/photos/a.501652999890027.1073741831.158890087499655/501962603192400/?type=3&theater – the little flower girl appears to have had her face eaten off!! ACK!! I know you get shots like this at every wedding but why oh WHY would you include them in the album instead of trashing them?
This photo: https://www.facebook.com/158890087499655/photos/a.501652999890027.1073741831.158890087499655/501997899855537/?type=3&theater – by the fauxtogs own admission in the comments, was a very important photo to the bride – and she was given a completely soft/out of focus shot with horrid split lighting on her face.
In this one, it looks like her sister is about to choke her: https://www.facebook.com/158890087499655/photos/a.501652999890027.1073741831.158890087499655/501997926522201/?type=3&theater – hand placement, people!! Ugh!
It makes me seriously ill to my stomach when I see wedding ‘photography’ like this. It is (hopefully) the one and only wedding the bride will ever have and this shite is all she has to remember it. It is inexcusable that someone would call themselves a ‘wedding photographer’ and do work of this quality. Go back to sticking babies in buckets and making heart hands on pregnant bellies – those can all be shot all over again the next day and no harm done. BUT FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY LEAVE THE BRIDES AND THE GROOMS TO THE PEOPLE WHO KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING!
Just had to get that off my chest. I don’t know why I go and look at this stuff because I know all I am going to do is upset myself. I know I said before that most of the ‘clients’ of these fauxtogs often look like refugees from the ‘people of Walmart’ shoots BUT I also can see where they have taken some pretty average people and instead of portraying them in flattering light and combination poses to be the best they can be, they have TURNED THEM INTO people of Walmart photo contestants.August 18, 2014 at 10:15 pm #21431picstopParticipant
I’ve quickly looked at the odd post and posted crummy photos on this site from time to time and I feel I ought to finally say something. Now, I haven’t read every post in every thread so I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s been said but, “it’s not the faux’s fault”. Just plain nasty hurt-my-eyes and assault my senses crap isn’t necessarily the fault of the fauxs out there. People actually love the results and praise them. Why should they get better? Case in point, NoLovelossless goes through some very nasty “product” by a faux who should be required by law to be prohibited from using a camera. However, this was not her first wedding! She has a raft of clients from weddings to boudoir. And every one of these people, including their families, just fell in love with the results. Hell, I’ve shot a massive number of weddings over the years myself with many many weddings at my own church. The rug in the sanctuary is blue. I’ve seen other photographer’s results where the rug is green. Their clients did not notice. Mine did but that’s a different story. The point is, many people out there are more than happy to settle for garbage. No doubt that Christina sucks massively but her customers love it. The world has simply become a more pathetic place where garbage is praised. And again, on the flipside, at least I don’t have to entertain emails and consults from these customers as they happily flock to people like Christina.August 18, 2014 at 10:26 pm #21432fstopper89Participant
This was suggested by someone for wedding photography. https://www.facebook.com/BudgetBridalPartyServices
It’s all crap. Then I found the “wedding photos not taken by me but edited by me” album. One of those photos was used in her advertising collage piece. Um, hello… copyright infringement….August 19, 2014 at 5:15 am #21442NoLoveLosslessParticipant
*sigh* I know what you are saying, picstop, I know. *sigh* Kind of reminds me of the old saying ‘ignorance of the law is no excuse.’ And, what’s more, I know a lot of these folks ARE poor – ‘real’ wedding photographer feel completely out of reach to them – most of the wedding events are obviously done in family homes/yards/small churches and the people attending are plain, simple folks. These are not people who can whip out the check book and get David Ziser or Jerry Ghionis to pop in and document their day. But, dammit, it just breaks my heart for these folks. There ARE affordable photogs out there. And many, like me, willing to work with the couple to come up with something reasonable in their price range and still give them good quality.
Good Lord fstopper89 – She is atrocious! And, indeed, if ‘you aslo get the expirience I’ve gained from the planning and preparation I’ve done for several other weddings over the years!’ then how come she has no photos of her own to show for it???? And I LOVE this one: https://www.facebook.com/BudgetBridalPartyServices/photos/a.691538427538135.1073741825.499380863420560/799251556766821/?type=3&theater – I think the power lines add that extra special touch, don’t you?
*sigh* the world keeps on spinning, doesn’t it?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.