Home › Forums › Am I a Fauxtog? › Fauxtogs who should end up on the main page…
Tagged: fauxtog?
- This topic has 3,097 replies, 358 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 6 months ago by cameraclicker.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 19, 2013 at 8:21 am #15261TiradiaParticipant
I… Think it is trying to communicate with us! So you own Two modeling agencies? *snort* for some reason I have a hard time believing that. Based upon your grammar and lack there of. I have a hard time believing anything you say. And by get them on your bed… Are you implying you had sexual relations with your clients? If so you are the worst kind of faux out there.
November 19, 2013 at 9:11 am #15263NoProParticipant@ mkeller
“i have 170 models that work with me,, ask any of them what kind of person i am.”
I’d guess the answer would be (amongst other things) “literally challenged”. Do I win something?
November 19, 2013 at 10:37 am #15267TiradiaParticipantYou win a cookie! And a new mark III! Contact mkeller to collect your prize 🙂
November 19, 2013 at 3:22 pm #15282mkellerParticipantIts not about what im doing. Its the fact none of you know me and posting awful things about me. I just dont understand it. If you truly care about our passion, you should actually respect the fact that we make sure that the models are safe and dont get hooked up with the creepers that are out there . The ones that give photographers a bad name. And NO, I dont sleep with the models.lol
November 19, 2013 at 3:46 pm #15285nesgranParticipantAny chance of someone linking to the original post? My memory isn’t what it used to be
November 19, 2013 at 3:53 pm #15286mkellerParticipantNovember 19, 2013 at 5:26 pm #15288nesgranParticipantnow I remember, not the most tasteful photography but not enough to think you’re a pervert. I would say however your consistency is awful, you have nice shots that could be in a lad’s mag and then you have absolute disasters that are worthy of the front page. Including those train wrecks doesn’t scream professionalism to me
November 19, 2013 at 6:00 pm #15289WilsonParticipantToo much skin smoothing on most of the models, and some of the poses don’t look ‘sexy’ but scary..
November 21, 2013 at 6:57 am #15318MGParticipanthttps://www.facebook.com/pages/Kaara-Lee-Photography/621869544510769?fref=ts You can’t get better than 45 images for $10! But wait, there is 50% off for November – 45 images for $5, bargain!
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=610489519016434&set=a.610489482349771.1073741879.302735219791867&type=1&theater so natural and not posed!
November 21, 2013 at 7:49 am #15319cameraclickerParticipantNovember 22, 2013 at 11:13 pm #15336fstopper89ParticipantApparently Justine is stepping down from being a photographer because God did not want her to be a photographer. And she admitted to using a point-and-shoot. So her alter-ego Marissa is taking over the page and then planning to take it down, apparently.
The thing with Justine is, who cares if she loves taking pictures. Everyone has a right to take fun shapshots of their kids and friends and post them to Facebook. But one should not advertise that they are a photographer. She just failed to see the difference.
November 24, 2013 at 5:55 am #15344Worst Case ScenarioParticipantThis guys photography seems to tick all the wrong boxes
His prices make no sense at all…
http://www.bobsearle.net/special-offers.html
His portraits look like they were bought at the photoshop of horrors…
http://www.bobsearle.net/andrew-sara–children.html
and he even shows weddings from the archives, so you can see how little he has improved over the years..
November 24, 2013 at 11:00 am #15345jim-eParticipant@WCS – His website states that he has over 30yrs of experience – all I can say is wow! I somewhat understand the faux’s that get the shiny new DSLR, their friends tell them how great they are and they think they can become pros – it just ignorance and not really appreciating the craft due to lack of experience and knowledge. But guys like this I will never understand. I mean he didn’t even accidentally take a good photo. Thirty years?? A bunch of on camera flash, bad poses, terrible light, lousy framing, no regard for backgrounds – the list goes on.
For someone (apparently) so experienced there is little thought whatsoever to the pictures being taken. Have to shake my head on this one.
November 24, 2013 at 2:33 pm #15350cameraclickerParticipant@jim-e — “Professional” just means money is involved. “Experience” suggests practice, though not necessarily growth.
If you shoot 10,000 photos of the same thing, in the same light, virtually the same way every time, do you have as much experience as the person who shoots 5,000 photos of various subjects in varying light at many locations?
November 24, 2013 at 3:52 pm #15352jim-eParticipantActually, I never used the word “professional”, I was commenting purely from a photo-graphical perspective. My meaning was that for somebody that has as much apparent experience as he does, I would expect a certain amount of fundamentals regarding photographing people. But experience definitely does not equal good, so really I shouldn’t be surprised.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.