Home Forums Main YANAP Discussion Forum This faux will most likely be sued… Reply To: This faux will most likely be sued…


Hi browneyedgirl89,

I saw the vid of the episode you are referring to. I seem to recall that was in the ‘hood of 2010 or so.

The sad part of this is that in the US $5000 is beyond Small Claims Court, so a lawyer is going to be required.

You have said:

Obviously it is partially the couple’s fault for not doing their research beforehand, but I think they now have a really good case to take this to court.

And that is pretty much going to sum this up. Leave out the word “partially” and you have the reality.

They are going to pay for this oversight regardless of any court decision because they will never recoup their losses. The lawyers will see to that (they don’t work for nothing) and they would love to get a case like this. And that is if they win the case. And if they do win can the photog pay? And if the photog doesn’t then what? And how soon is this going to go into over $5000 because it will be delayed until after the couple’s fourth child (lawyers again). The time, expense, heartache, misery involved in this type of pursuit is unbelievable. Great way to start off a marriage, huh?

There is a breach as well as a “good faith” dispute and possibly more. Have they paid the “photographer” and if so how? And if so how is it that they paid in full before an event and without reviewing the work? Did they get a guarantee and in writing? Is it possible to contact their credit card company regarding this? Stop payment on a check? Sounding like the case is a case of “live and learn”. In the real world Judge Judy Joe Brown doesn’t exist like it does on a TV show.

As for the shooters site? One look tells the story as to whether they should be hired. I got a stomach ache with only the music. Then the fauxtos started and I had the urge to rub my head with a cheese grater to take my mind off my aching stomach!

A lot of time is spent here slamming fauxtographers. Probably rightly so. You want to stop them? Spend that time educating the consumer. Regardless of a court decision they can never replace a lost wedding shoot. I’ll say it again: they will never recoup their losses.

I surely wish them the best of luck with an unfortunate circumstance.