Home › Forums › Let’s Talk Photography › Selective Coloring vs. Kim Anderson's Photography › Reply To: Selective Coloring vs. Kim Anderson's Photography
May 14, 2013 at 10:11 am
#9661
Thom
Participant
I agree with WCS, it is tinted to make them more “vintage” looking. Whilst the fauxtogs look like really bad spray paint and have no context as to why they would do selective coloring. It’s a pretty fine line. I think most consumers, much like the hair pulling decisions made by clients WCS mentioned, are why you do see a LOT of bad selective coloring. To me, it’s just all around bad.