Reply To: Fauxtogs who should end up on the main page…

[fstopper89]

Ugh, what a total skeeve! Those are minors (well maybe a few are 18) but still! He has no artistic talent.

@iliketag- I know what you mean. Boudoir shoots, when done right, can be very tasteful yet sexy. If I had a shoot like that done I would maybe post one or two tame ones online, but the rest would be only for “specific” eyes to see. Those photos scream “trashy.” I don’t mean to say the girls are trashy girls, but the way they are portrayed in the photos is. Reminds me again of this creepy photographer guy in my town who frequents the bars with his big camera asking girls if he can do a photoshoot.

Here, I found another local fauxtog. She’s been around for awhile and I was hoping to maybe see some improvement since the last time I looked, but sadly there is none. She has no idea how to manipulate light. Her posts are kiddish and unprofessional. She claims she doesn’t do much editing, that she doesn’t add or remove things in the photos, and “what I shoot is what you get.” Um, it’s more like she has no skill to do these things which are sometimes necessary or preferred. She says she’s a photographer, not a graphic artist… as if that is supposed to make her a better photographer than those who do editing. If there was a photographer out there (and there are many!) who hardly have to edit at all and have superb images, that’s fine, but clearly she is not one of those. And most of her photos are out-of-focus. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Attic-Box-Photography/207405492633671

Since she claims to not add or remove things, this is obviously not a composite… and it doesn’t look safe to me. Even a fall off of this small trunk has the potential to seriously hurt this newborn. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=514316181942599&set=a.514316025275948.117689.207405492633671&type=1&theater