Actually, misstiffanybaby, I would be safe in saying that more than likely people who post here are seasoned photographers who can more than likely back up your accusations with good, quality work. This entire “fauxphotographer” website exists because of the influx of “fauxphotogrophers” that have saturated the markets. If any of the “fauxtographers” showcased in this thread can get on here and substantiate whether or not they have actually studied photography for the length of time required (or should be required, I should say), or backed up with Tax ID, registration and insurance before slapping up a facebook page and “business”, then by all means, we stand corrected.
The proof is in the work, honey. The results of actual quality photos, of which I haven’t seen in any of the examples provided here.