Reply To: Fauxtogs who should end up on the main page…

[fstopper89]

OMG… this thread just got FUCKING ENTERTAINING! Lol! When I saw that there were this many pages since I last was here a few days ago, my thought was “dang, I bet Justine finally found her way here and is throwing a fit.” Yep, I’m 100% right. Justine (or should we say Lawyer Bill, coolmommy, or jucie whatever), welcome to this site.

I’ve never seen anyone butcher the English language in quite the manner that you do on your fauxtography page, and yes I did see that new group you created for new photographers, and for some reason you have multiple personal profiles (one with your last name and one where you’ve taken your boyfriend’s last name?). I do feel bad that someone was calling you at 1:00 AM. That’s about the extent of my feeling bad.

Newsflash crazy chick- you are “talking people into taking their picture” with what, a cell phone or some crappy point and shoot? The sad part is you’re not even charging faux prices, you’re charging upwards of $100! I’m pretty sure all these “bookings” you have are made up BS. The photos on your page are of your son, and are photos of yourself your friends took, and photos by Walmart and various other entities that you’ve “edited” (in other words, added neon text and clipart to).

I did also catch the “bitter sweet memories” thing. Memories you capture shouldn’t be bittersweet. They should be sweet. Bittersweet means sad but happy, like a child entering the military or something.

You’re just one confused person with an I.Q. of like what, 70?

You cannot sue people for linking public website URLs. If you want criticism to stop, first remove the original source, and second, well stop doing everything you are doing. Slander and/or libel have to be false statements in writing, online, or in person that directly damage a business’s name or profitability. You for one do not have a legal business, so that’s null and void. No one here is saying “Justine is an abusive mother” or something like that, which could be considered an illegal statement unless it were proven to be true. They’re saying your photography and grammar suck. Both of which are truths, and the photography part is an opinion. And well, if the majority of competent, intelligent photographers say your photography sucks, then yes, it does. If there are any smart computer nerds here who know how to track IP addresses, I’m pretty sure they could prove that Lawyer Bill is sitting on your couch right now.

Your logo and poster are something that a 4th grader would have made to advertise their lemonade stand. I mean come on.

A lawyer, by the way, knows how to spell and properly capitalize words.

One of your props includes a dirty white laundry basket with a silk-like blanket. WTF?

Um yeah, and your son is not a miner. He’s a minor. Big, big, difference. I don’t think he’s old enough to take an axe and chisel down into some cavernous mountain and get coal.

Sorry my thoughts do not follow a very consistent flow here, but this is all just too funny.