Reply To: Fauxtographers in Court

[creyes8519]

Judge seems like a photographer to me.  Obviously it’s been a while (using old-school terms like “ASA” lol), but it’s obvious he knows what he is talking about.   In the beginning he gave the fauxtog the benefit of the doubt, saying that perhaps she was getting the proofs from Walmart.  Judge didn’t saying anything “fauxtog-ish” lol.. he asked legitimate questions, where’s the full-frame camera?  Where’s the fast lens?  The client was VERY forgiving and only asked for $1000 and considered the fauxtog’s time (which doesn’t account for the fact that this woman RUINED a very special part of the couple’s wedding).
Had the judge not had any knowledge what-so-ever about photography, the fauxtog might have convinced him about the “no flash photography” thing and perhaps the plaintiff would have had a more difficult time.