The Glamor Glow filter ought to be illegal. And why create something that you’d expect to see on website for pedophiles??? Awful. Bad. Terrible. Just plain bad.
so this photo isnt her best work but have any of you even looked at the rest of her stuff, its really not all that bad, this site just picks out the worst of everyone stuff, shes petty popular in her town by how many people she has photographed, maybe you all should look at the rest before you judge her. this site is ridiculous some photos deserve being on here but not these
no this site was for photographers to help each other in what they are doing wrong, now all it is doing is making fun of other photos, some are really bad but this image its self isnt just the editing!
Why exactly are the websites Not posted? If these are so called “professionals” and have their name/work out there for the world to see on their own account, then why does it matter if we see their names or not? Nothing wrong with a little free advertisement. It’s work they’re obviously proud of so why can’t we go see the rest of their portfolios?
NickE
Sweet mother of…..The pearls, I just can’t stop looking at the pearls!
Shiznit1984
The photo itself is adorable, but the red rim around the eyes screams too much time getting intimate with the “saturate” sponge in Photoshop.
pixelmunkie
oh for pity sake – wth?
maybe… nm- this cannot be explained *facepalm
Wsroadrunner
That’s horrible. Who the f*** would do that to a toddler? Someone shoot that fauxtog…. quick
Gina
Babies are flawless. Why is there such a need to touch them up?
Henny
cause if you have the tools, you MUST use them!
Kat
The Glamor Glow filter ought to be illegal. And why create something that you’d expect to see on website for pedophiles??? Awful. Bad. Terrible. Just plain bad.
ashlee
agreed!
Dana
Ummmm….no. Not even a “cute” photo. Not sure anything would have made this better. Well, except a GOOD photographer! LOL
Brian
Someone trying to live vicariously through their baby? Well, it stinks.
BurninBiomass
Whats the matter Tex…. are ya yeller?
JF
WTC is in the background???
Salzie
Its been so far overedited that it looks like a frikin digital illustration!
Annoyed
There’s that watermark again. This person should be ashamed.
Sam
GAAK!
ashlee
put the camera down… slowly… and walk away ….. and never , ever , ever , pick it back up !!
ashley
so this photo isnt her best work but have any of you even looked at the rest of her stuff, its really not all that bad, this site just picks out the worst of everyone stuff, shes petty popular in her town by how many people she has photographed, maybe you all should look at the rest before you judge her. this site is ridiculous some photos deserve being on here but not these
Canaduck
You’re wrong.
ashley
no this site was for photographers to help each other in what they are doing wrong, now all it is doing is making fun of other photos, some are really bad but this image its self isnt just the editing!
Hobbyist
Why exactly are the websites Not posted? If these are so called “professionals” and have their name/work out there for the world to see on their own account, then why does it matter if we see their names or not? Nothing wrong with a little free advertisement. It’s work they’re obviously proud of so why can’t we go see the rest of their portfolios?
Janet
I see the makings of a new reality show in this one: Toddlers & Tiaras …. & Piknik!
fireandice20062008
A cute picture but really badly edited and colored.