Baby’s watching you…
← Previous post
Next post →
I’m sure it was just the alien encounter vibe they were hoping for.
What is with this making kids look dead thing? Jesus Murphy …
I think the soulless dead black shark eyes just does it for me. And I love sharks. Just not shark eyes on kids.
Not only is the photo bad but the photoshopping is worse.
Was this shot using an IR CCTV camera?
Why is Moby so small?
Nice! I was trying to come up with a “Powder” joke like that, but decided you nailed it with a less obscure reference.
Hairy belly? ick.
Not shorts, it’s one of those pettiskirts that were all the rage.
You know,i used to come look at these gawd awful shots.I`d make some smart ass comment about how i couldn`t believe some one would pay good money for this crap.But now i just look at them…because i would need a smart ass comment book,filled with every smartass comment known to man.Mainly cause the GAWD awful shots just keep getting worst by the day.
P.S. I still can`t believe some people pay for this shit.
Ok. Now im scared. They are walking amongst us!
i just finished watching ‘Fringe’ on scy-fy channel… this answers EVERYTHING!
Ummm….why is his belly button off-center?!? Ew!!!!
Insult the quality of the photo all you want, but don’t insult a small child, ok? Especially for something as dumb as that. He could be twisted to the side a bit for all you know.
If you’re going to go on abut the child, it would be better to mention how the fauxtog made the kid look creepy/bad/hilarious, whatever.
Ummm… the little girl is turned to the side a little bit. I’m worried about what you would have said if she was cross-eyed or was born with a deformity. Petty and rude!
Either way, the photo is horrendous.
Yikes. The Great White Hope?
Oops missed a spot
What could have been a cool shot, ruined by a PS hack
spot coloring…. why do so many fauxtogs think it’s the newest coolest thing to do since not everyone is doing it??? We don’t do it because it’s not cool; and when we do it, there’s a purpose and we do it properly. This is a sad example of how bad people can be at using photoshop. Good thing this fauxtog watermarked this image. I could have stolen it and pass it off as my own work…. NOT!!!
Why did the fauxtog remove his/her nipples?
HOLY CRAP! I kept looking and looking to try to put my finger on exactly what it was about this that was so disturbing. I mean, it’s not like I spend much time around near-naked infants…but yeah, that’s creepy..not that this photo needed any more creepiness added.
If the ‘tog was striving to make the child appear other-wordly, it would have been far more sensible to brush out the navel button before worrying over nipples….unless of course they were worried about somebody thinking a bare-nippled baby girl would be considered pornography.
As for the spot colour, I could do better than that with both eyes tied behind my back.
Wow, I was too wrapped up in the general horror of the photo to notice that. Well spotted!
I don’t understand the image to be honest. It is almost disturbing in some strange way…
Weird pose as well. Looks like the kid will karate chop you and not even have to put down the lollipop.
Oh my dear Lord. I can not imagine putting my name on this if it were mine. That poor child! I guess this fauxtog’s idea of editing is to press every button on whatever editing program he/she uses. That is one of the most horrific photos I have ever seen, and when you can make a pretty child look that bad you earn the moniker Fauxtog in flying spot colours!
the fauxtog can be overheard at the completion of post processing
head sort of melting away at the edges–CHECK
what appears to be a hairy abdomen–CHECK
yep, this one is a keeper.
The avatar has returned!
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.