This seems like a dangerous position…
← Previous post
Next post →
could of at least got it in focus hmmmm and is the fauxtog offering a home sterilization service as well at the same time :/
Finger on trigger. Yes. This is the proper way to handle a gun.
Must be an ad for gun safety…
That gun smells fishy.
AAAAH! NO!!! In the name of intact genitalia, PLEASE NO!
um…….?? WHY would they do this??
Is that a man or a lady? I can’t tell.
well, if it’s a female, i wouldn’t necessarily call her a lady.
I dunno. Their name is Billy, according to the ‘witch’s part.
Oops, typo… that was supposed to be ‘with’ not ‘witch.’ LOL
Love those tacky ass fake cuffs!
Yes, this would be lovely if the handcuffs were real. :-/
I’m going to call this pose the “Plaxico Burress”.
In answer to the old question: That’s a gun in my pants.
At least it’s not cocked…
This was produced by a ignorant person with a camera who possesses absolutely no knowledge of the subject. Out of focus, poorly exposed and the list goes on and on.
I could actually handle the entire image as a creative interpretation … if… IF … If it was in focus.
This has taken place not to far from my town, now I have to move.
Found the fauxtographer, veteran of 16 years professional experience. Claims to be a lifestyle photographer but will shoot everything from model portfolios to special events. She also loves capturing weddings and other special moments. The locations are actually locations according to Facebook but if they are in a studio, then it is staged. (Did she really have to say this?)
Most of the other photos are in f16 focus but the poses are just as bad.
With 16 years of experience, why doesn’t see have an actual email address (not just hotmail/yahoo/gmail) and a real website? $30 a year is too much?
how did you find the fauxtographer’s site?
Just found it as well I don’t know how they chose just one photo, their page should be deleted!
Seems my comment was not visible.
I groaned at what is possible a bad pun
Good one Kat!
I was going to call it “the love gun”.
Holstering …. your doing it wrong.
Uhm let’s see…not only is this a tacky-ass pose, and potentially dangerous if a) that gun’s real and b) loaded, but the whole implied bondage thing is pretty disturbing. That whole rope+handcuffs+gun = rape kit.
Yes, agree – disturbing really! Think the fauxtog should be taken a look at by the men in white coats!
how can you guys find these people even though the watermarks/info is blacked out..? i see that the “model” is either billy or rilly but i cant make out enough of the fauxtographer’s name to search it lol teach me the ways! 🙂
The info wasn’t fully marked out. I would go with Billy
I’m not sure what to say on this! Someone email me the photog’s website info!
WHAT THE HECK.
This is WRONG WRONG WRONG. Where to even begin…?
I love this. Why? Because it’s so bad words aren’t even needed. Although I love it when people write in with serious responses. Do you really think the photographer is reading it?
Yet another FINE example of “thug life” “ethnic” fauxtography. Wurd up, yo.
1. Never point a gun at something you don’t intend to shoot.
2. If the gun is double action, it need not be, ahem, “cocked,” to fire.
3. If it is a man, now he is probably a gelding, or a eunuch.
Oh yeah. Because people in handcuffs typically have access to guns. This looks like a bad interpretation of a movie poster for a low budget 80s all female prison movie. No wait…it looks like an original movie poster for a low budget 80s all female prison movie.
Great. Now my gun smells like tuna.
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.