You Are Not a Photographer - Bad Photography Blog

You aren't logged in Register

Red Headed Vampire

We’re not sure if they were trying to make her look like a sparkly undead, but even if that was the goal here, the result is just awful…

37 Comments
  1. DUDU says:

    Who vomited on the photo?

       2 likes

  2. pixie says:

    too bad a not so awful shot was completely destroyed by really bad- REALLY bad editing :-/

       2 likes

  3. Gina says:

    I don’t even know what to say… I started with Why then Who then What the… and couldn’t finish. That is nothing short of a train wreck.

       4 likes

  4. ajay says:

    I wonder if they paid for this photo? Or if it ended up on the peoples court..

       5 likes

  5. Ipshwitz says:

    They probably not only paid for it, but gushed compliments upon the photographer about how amazing it is.

       6 likes

  6. nine says:

    I wonder why people keep buying the cameras with the “crappy shot” settings… weird.

       14 likes

  7. Lindsay says:

    W T F

       0 likes

  8. mimi.of.6 says:

    a bit over processed??????

       4 likes

  9. GoneFusion GoneFusion says:

    come on guys…quit “clowning” around…oh, whoops!

       18 likes

  10. Alexis says:

    Too bad, the shot of the girl itself is actually pretty good; this is clearly someone who needs to have their Photoshop access restricted.

       7 likes

  11. Angela says:

    Why would anyone think that looks good?

       2 likes

  12. TollToll says:

    Want to know how I got these scars?

       7 likes

  13. Sam says:

    Wow! I didn’t know they still made those wax candy lips! I haven’t seen those since I was a kid.

       11 likes

  14. Kat says:

    More transvestite than undead but scary nonetheless.

       6 likes

  15. Kevin says:

    Well done to this Photog on having the worst edited picture on this site.

       7 likes

  16. no one special says:

    I could understand this pic if there was a caption under it, “This is my Ex.”

       7 likes

  17. Tina says:

    Why so serious?

       11 likes

  18. spike says:

    Bad colour editing aside, what’s with the seemingly random blurring? That’s not bad AF-area selection, but there’s no sense to it unless they were going for some kind of tilt-shift look….or were trying to clone-stamp and smudge-tool out a huge scar or facial tattoo or something.

       2 likes

  19. TollToll says:

    Seriously, is this a dude?

       1 likes

  20. Ciao_Chao says:

    I thought vampires didn’t show up on cameras.

       2 likes

  21. Gracie says:

    my favorite part is how they tried to make the watermark look like it was a tattoo on her arm….GEEZZ! I honestly feel bad for this lady/whatever the heck she is. Either she got her pics back and cried for a month, or she got them back and loved them….not sure under which scenario I should feel more badly for her……

       7 likes

  22. John says:

    I would love to come up with something witty and profound after seeing this but all I have is, honestly, WTF?

       1 likes

  23. justme says:

    I’m confused. No matter which side of the photo-retouch debate you fall on, we can pretty much agree that photo-retouching is generally used to remove/minimize things like dark under-eye circles, uneven facial coloring, and shadows that obscure the model’s facial features. It appears this fauxtog has used photo-retouching to ADD all three of those things. Also love the way her poorly-drawn lipstick appears to be hovering several inches away from her face.

       2 likes

  24. robert says:

    Another low. Thanks YANAP.
    Not sure that image was good before processing. Looks to me that the exposure was very bad to begin with, and the processing was done to cover that up.

       0 likes

  25. Ralph says:

    It’s just… well literally unbelieveable.

    It’s like the fotog ruined it with a bit of editing, and then lost the undo button, so just had to keep going and keep going trying to save it but making it worse. Does make you wonder what’s underneath all the editing that they felt this was better than the original.

    I mean seriously, who sits back, looks at this and says “yup, that’s what I wanted”

       2 likes

  26. kbee says:

    Fauxtog – STEP AWAY FROM THE PHOTOSHOP. SLOWLY. JUST BACK UP. There you go. Put down the blur tool. Let go of the vignette. Just walk away. It’s okay. Wait, drop that saturation tool in your pocket. Set it down. There you go. Easy, easy.

       4 likes

  27. Me says:

    Why are the photos on this site getting worse? Wow. Just…wow.

       0 likes

  28. Twiggy says:

    Homer! You’ve left your makeup shotgun set to whore!

       14 likes

  29. Hanimex Omelette says:

    I really didn’t think I had picked Amanita Muscaria on my last Mycological hike, but I might be wrong.

       0 likes

  30. Ann says:

    My first thought was trans…just because of the strength of the make-up color, which is more common among MTFs who need to downplay their male features. And then maybe that wasn’t sufficient, so the faux just wrecked it.

       0 likes

  31. drpeters says:

    Obviously an example of a fauxtog’s work… straight from the camera rubbish!

       0 likes

  32. Yani Dueri says:

    I know i’m not the only one thinking this looks like a manly man wearing make up?

       0 likes

Would you like to login? Get an Account!