You Are Not a Photographer - Bad Photography Blog

You aren't logged in Register

Hats Are For Your Head…

Hats are usually for on your head, but feel free to keep that one there…

43 Comments
  1. Amy says:

    As a military spouse, this is a disgrace. Respect the uniform. Please excuse me while I go vomit.

       67 likes

  2. Don says:

    even if she was dressed the coloring alone makes me vomit. Who would ever put a company name up there? Photography is the most over used term and underachieved profession.

       6 likes

  3. Summer says:

    Ugh! Disgusting.

       3 likes

  4. You've Got To Be Kidding Me says:

    I completely concur with Amy above…. That is disrespectful, distasteful, and disgusting. Why would anyone want to do this especially someone who wears the uniform?!?!?!?!???

       13 likes

    • Amy says:

      I will never understand wives who pose in nothing else but their husbands uniform. They always use the argument “I want to show him how proud I am of him.” Sorry hunny, taking naked photos of yourself wearing nothing but your husbands uniform is NOT how you show your husband how proud you are of him. If you want to do that, keep it classy by keeping your clothes on. ARG LOL

         7 likes

  5. JE says:

    Two words…. Salvation Army.

       5 likes

  6. Kim says:

    goddamnit. stop that horrible shit right now.

       6 likes

  7. monolith says:

    I thought it was an old-timey Jiffy Pop perched atop there, at half steam. I love Jiffy Pop, but man!, that was enough to put me right the hell off it.

       7 likes

  8. KB says:

    Oh my! With the terrible rainbow effect, I didn’t even notice the military uniform at first. That’s AWFUL!

       16 likes

  9. Ashley Taylor says:

    thats a hat?

       7 likes

  10. Conny says:

    This fautox FB site is FULL of bad lighting, out of focus, oversaturated, bad posing. Of course the name contains the warning signs “moments” and ” to memories”.Its just BAD

       1 likes

  11. PGB says:

    In addition to all of the above comments, what’s up with the pose and angle? It looks like the subject was the victim of a transporter malfunction: head, limbs, and torso put back together all wrong.

       9 likes

    • Intuition says:

      I *think* it’s supposed to be that pin up-esque pose with the legs up in the air? Or maybe that’s to much credit -_-

         1 likes

      • Pelham says:

        That is giving them wayyy too much credit. If you google images for pinup girls from the 40s and 50s, yes, they were skimpily clad and had unrealistic bodies. But not once, ever, did Vargas or any other artist at that time EVER depict a pinup in such a tawdry pose. There is a very fine line between erotica and porn, beit soft or hard. This falls into the porn category.

           1 likes

  12. C. Lynn says:

    All I see is cellulite. And that “effect” in photoshop is not helping her issue.

       1 likes

  13. trooper dan says:

    someones putting on her own special USO show.

       0 likes

  14. Chris says:

    Ok, the transporter accident just made me have a coughing fit!

       0 likes

  15. prinnie says:

    LMFAO Ashley — is that a hat? hahahah! I love love love this site! I can’t believe people are actually paying for this tripe!!

       0 likes

  16. Sandy says:

    This is disrespectful and I can’t imagine anyone would find this attractive. Shame on the photog…errr…eh hem, person who took this.

       1 likes

  17. r says:

    AHHAHAHAHAAH

       0 likes

  18. Bob Bob says:

    This was shot by a GWC posing as a fauxtog.

       0 likes

  19. Steven Webb says:

    This photo was obviously the result of a camera falling off a table and being severely bumped on the way to the floor causing an accidental trip of the shutter button. It is also a shame that the impact knocked all the colors out of whack. This is the only explanation for something this horrid, it could not have been intentionally taken.

       8 likes

  20. Steph says:

    This is in very poor taste, to say the least.

       1 likes

  21. Jaymee says:

    In all fairness she could have had a lot of hair down there that also needed to be pretty for the shoot

       0 likes

    • SpotMeeter says:

      If that’s the case, then I appreciate the placement of a hat…or a table cloth, or a vase…when I first saw this pic I thought it was a Carmen Miranda tribute gone horribly wrong, I kept looking for the fruit basket.

         0 likes

  22. Gina says:

    What’s with the red?? Are they trying to imply her loins are burning or she’s on her period and using the hat for that?? And…totally agree on the fact that this is a total disgrace to the uniform. Disrespectful!!!!

       2 likes

  23. Oh No She Didn't says:

    Terrible pose, terrible photo, so many things wrong with this. Why is this person putting this garbage online? Complete disgrace to the uniform… This is BAD on every single level.

       0 likes

  24. looks like a thermometer scale or ph scale with the transition from blue to red lol

       1 likes

  25. TollToll says:

    what the??

       0 likes

  26. Pelham says:

    Guess she put the hat there so nobody could *snatch* it off her head…and everything else aside like the ghastly pose and awful pp, it is a terrible insult to the uniform, which I didn’t recognize at first as y eyes were burning from the pp. Disgraceful all around.

       0 likes

  27. Mrs Woo Mrs Woo says:

    Honestly it took the “disgrace to the uniform” comment for me to realize it was – I thought it was some kind of shimmery 90s-type jacket like you’d imagine a pole dancer wearing before they took it off and that the umm.. hat there was supposed to match it… something like I saw the one time I got to go to Penn Station with my cousins in New York City.

    Wow.

    There is nothing redeeming about this picture. Absolutely nothing.

       5 likes

  28. Ken says:

    Uh, where do you guys find these? I need to poke out my mind’s eye after that one. When I first saw the picture, I thought it was a dude because the legs looked hairy….and then I realized it wasn’t. Wow…I didn’t think the photography bar could be lowered much further.

       2 likes

  29. H says:

    Congratulations, it’s a ……………………………………… hat?

       6 likes

  30. Digger says:

    Pardon my ignorance, but what’s a GWC?

       3 likes

    • stef says:

      GWC is Guy With Camera. Only in the field to try to shoot naked women. Very slimy, but intentions may not be immediately obvious.

      MWC is Mom With Camera, who thinks shooting her 5 toddlers running around makes her an expert.

         6 likes

  31. LongRange says:

    Somebody give her CPR! Oh wait…

       0 likes

  32. spike says:

    What in the ever-lovin’ hell?

    As for the cut of that headgear, it’s hard to tell in this hot mess of a photo, but it ought to be a garrison cap > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Side_cap < more widely known as the c**t-cap.

       0 likes

  33. creagray says:

    I think “wife in uniform” photos could be done to be sexy and a sweet gift for the husband. But they should be for the husband not for the internet and would certainly not look like this. (former military spouse, so my say totally counts more than your say.)

       3 likes

  34. Nathan says:

    I remember this filmstrip from basic training. Man, the worst were the photos of venereal warts…wait, this isn’t a VD information photo? Well, it sure fooled me!
    Beware the purple people eater! It will give you Tropicrotch!
    To the juicing room with her!

       1 likes

  35. justme says:

    My first thought: what happened to that poor guy’s head?

       0 likes

  36. C says:

    As a military spouse, I don’t think wearing your husband’s uniform in a shoot is necessarily wrong. My husband asked for a shot in his ACU’s while he was deployed. BUT it does need to be done classy, and for his eyes. This is far from classy.

       0 likes

  37. M says:

    I know who took this and i wish i could say this is the worst of it. She even charges for this.

       0 likes

Would you like to login? Get an Account!