There’s a giant ghost baby in your yard!
When did reverse spot color become the newest “client” request? This is horrible, ugh.
This is just… No.
Cool another baby statue!!
For the love of God, WHY?
Why? Because it is around noon, the baby has no sun protection, but already a sunburn.
“Don’t blink. Don’t even blink. Blink and you’re dead. They are fast, faster than you can believe. Don’t turn your back. Don’t look away and don’t blink. Good luck.”
I feel like this is appropriate here.
LOL I was going to say that!! Don’t Blink!
Between the obvious coloring issue and the construction project in the background…ewwww!
Horrible photo and composition yes..but that’s not a construction project. That’s Fort Pulaski in Savannah, GA. Now personally I love photographing old forts, but for baby portraits, there are a million and one prettier places in and around Savannah for that sort of thing.
My immediate reaction was “Euuugggghhhh!!!”, which says it all really.
I just can’t believe it! I ask why??
So I take it this baby’s mom is Medusa?
Doctor Who reference = win.
That was an awesome episode.
wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey . . . stuff.
So .. does this photographer win a prize for inventing a new form of fauxtography?
I think Mom & Dad may want to schedule a pediatric visit sometime in the near future. Little Joany is looking a bit ashy.
Was this photo taken on the grounds of a jail?
Yeah, because most jails have canons sitting on the bastions
wow…..smartass……party of one….your table is ready. Lighten up there Mr Happypants.
Well if you want to pick nits, that part of the fort IS where they kept the prisoners..the “Immortal 600″
me = history nerd
Spot colour should be banned.
My first ever wedding i turned a picture Black and White and then painted in ever individual piece of falling confetti in colour. I sort of liked it. the client loved it, and any referal i get from that shoot, they always ask for it! So maybe it is us that are wrong…
Besides the obvious craptasticness of this photo, the fact that the photographer took the time to take away all the color from the baby but not remove the dust particles from the sky I find quite annoying.
The sky is a gradient fill which is why it looks so bad.
Is it just me, or does it seem like the fauxtographer also used flash to illuminate the grass that was within the closest proximity to the camera?
Well spotted. Maybe so. You think they could have used that flash to fill in the baby so she’s not smashed by the sun from the back so much.
i think they were going for the monumental statue look…..
I want to call this fauxtographer an asshole to their face
I’m so sick of these complete fucking amateurs passing this crap off on the masses
How about calling the client an asshole for paying for it? But not for the people who think this crap is fabulous, there would be no fauxtographers.
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Lost your password?
Username or E-mail: