You Are Not a Photographer - Bad Photography Blog

You aren't logged in Register

Crawling Dead

brain eating baby

Aw look how happy zombie baby is when he gets a whole brain to himself! Yummy!

  1. Amy S. says:

    Ahahahah this is fantastic!


  2. josh says:

    you wanna know how i got these berries?


  3. Kristian says:

    Dang! I wanted to know how he got the berries.


  4. I hate Fauxtography says:

    Oh noooooo! lol This is one of my all time favorites for sure. lmbo


  5. Alanna says:

    I hope someone takes this image and photoshops it into a really cool zombie scene.


  6. BurninBiomass says:

    “I ate his liver with some strained spinach and a nice juice box.”


  7. Jake says:

    What’s so bad about it? OK, the lighting is awful. Actually, non-existent. So nil points for technical skill. But here’s a cute kid with a gorgeous smile, having the time of his life, covered in berries. It’s lousy from a technical POV, but I guarantee the parents love this. Say what you want about the technical qualities of the photo, but you can’t deny the photographer captured a great expression.


    • Bob says:

      “but I guarantee the parents love this”…
      That’s the problem right there. No matter how crappy a pic is of a kid, the parents love it because it’s their kid, not because it’s a crappy, good or great pic. It’s the same with the bride and her dress, the dog owner and his/her dog and so on. The thing is, when and if they actually come across a good pic, they’ll see that theirs is crap in comparison and wish they had something nicer. Sometimes. Sometimes they just don’t care. That’s too bad. Other than that, the “great expression” is yet another excuse for a crappy pic. Whether it’s blown, crappy white balance, crappy colour, oof, poorly lit and so on doesn’t matter when the expression is captured beautifully. Tragically not so. It’s like frying up your chicken half way. It may still taste great but watch out 30 minutes later! Yes, it was a good half way effort but why can’t people give these kids the nice skin they were born with? I guess we can be grateful he/she didn’t do a selective colour job on the pic.


    • Spike says:

      Yes, he captured a cute expression, but there’s no context. Had the image included the fistful of berries or something like that to indicate that this was in fact NOT a zombie baby scene….and had the photographer balanced the lighting, checked background for that distracting bright spot, and not cropped the baby’s lower arm away in such an annoying way..then maybe this could have been a decent shot.


    • Jenn says:

      The photographer captured a picture that could be done by anyone with a P&S. It’s not professional quality, the parents could have taken this on their own. If someone paid for this photo, that’s a travesty.


    • Thom Thom says:

      I guess it’s worth $50.


  8. Chris says:

    Perfect! They even screwed up the white balance and gave the baby that wonderful “no blood flow” look.


  9. Seagate says:

    Baby Dexter


  10. Thom Thom says:

    dear god…


  11. Smh says:

    The junk on the face is staged. It’s a little too “neat” on the camera side. Besides, who ever had a child that did this this with berries? Probably none, definitely not mine. You need to “paint ” the fruit onto the kids to get this look. It’s all staged, people.


Would you like to login? Get an Account!